Allow me to interject a thought that might help in directing the investigation. This thought has, on it' s surface, nothing to do with your question.

I cam across it when I was researching something else entirely, that is, seemingly something else, yet, it is all connected and a grander scale.

During the time of 1779, there existed on this planet two republics that were based on

1. A declaration of independence
2. followed by a war
3. based on individual freedom.

one republic, of course, was the confederate United States of America. The other one was the Dutch Republic of the 7 provinces. The latter was past it heyday and in deep doodoo.

on the one hand there were the aspirations of freedom as detailed in the Act of Abjuration and the disappointments in it's manifestations. On the other, there was still this spirit, alive and well. So, certain interests decided to fuck those Royals in the ass when they weren' t paying attention and loaned the US a couple of million dollars in money through the Old Exchange Bank of Amsterdam, and allowed gun running though St Marten, a Caribbean Island, headed by a Governor.

interestingly, the gun running became obviously political when this governor decided to salute the gun-running USA Ship while it entered the harbor of St Marten. This, of course was a too blatant exhibition of self-governance, so the Governor got into hot water with the government in The Hague.

There are two things you I need you to appreciate before we continue. **1. The Dutch republic was a republic with a weak central government. **

This is elaborated in the Federal and anti-federalist papers. The Republic was a confederation of 7 provinces among which Holland was of main import, due to two factors: A. Amsterdam as one of the major financial centers, B. Rotterdam and Amsterdam, as the two main international harbors, which gave Holland pre-eminence economically among the state-provinces.

2. The republic had not ended royalty and nobility. Meaning that all kinds of influences were fighting for pre-eminence, and in short, the republicans and the royalist were at each other' s throats. The main character in this whole plot was William of Orange, stadhouder. He functioned as commander in chief.

Being a royal, family to the King of England, having family ties to the major royal houses in Europe, William could only stay afloat in his position as stadhouder due to foreign influence and military.

To him this was ideal, why? Because his family had a dream. A dream to become kings of The Netherlands. Scheming for 200 years, they finally were very close. First they had brought the Republic under English control. Second, they had schemed to make the position stadhouder as heritable. The final push would come. And this, the salute, was the cause belli they had been waiting for.

So, in 1780 war was declared between England and The Dutch Republic for the 4th time. Of course the Dutch lost that war. They lost everything on an international level. So no more international overseas trade. They lost all their colonies and factories.

to give you some idea what a a small amount of people can do: https://wikiless.org/media/wikipedia/commons/9/93/DutchEmpire15.png

Note: the dark green was not the colonial situation in 1780. As you know, NY was exchanged for Suriname and other regions of interest.

This caused an economic crisis. The Stadhouder, after a lot of strife and unsympathetic action, had to flee to London, where he was received with honors, as the deal was simply that in due course, William or his son would become king of The Netherlands.

In them days, the natural order was simply royal. A popular government, exercising sovereignty without a monarch, with the protection of the rich and connected was simply unthinkable.

In 1795 the Batavian Republic was constituted, but was totally impotent and the French had different plans. Napoleon finally, sucked the country into his empire.

After Napoleons defeat at Waterloo, England was done for, bankrupt, beholden to the Rothschilds. Beatrice de Graaf, in her book, fighting terror after Napoleon, recounts the process of the settling of all the debts. Yes, many more countries were bankrupt. Debts were bought and sold, put together, divided, and paid for pennies on the pound.

Of course, the Netherlands was bankrupt. So, it had to become a principality and a kingdom. Logically. But a dream was come true.

The first thing this King did was setup his own bank, the Dutch Central Bank, and kill the Old Exchange Bank. The City of London had taken over.

So, from several angles, you might say, plans were coming together. Some plans were made on the fly, other, were vision, or rather, wishes and dreams of centuries past.

So, with this in mind, is it unthinkable that the USA would encompass people who genuinely support the declaration of independence, the Bill of Rights and the Constitution? Who would band together and over time plan how to derail and thwart the commie takeover? Who would rather live in a country where self-governance and freedom are as normal as breathing?

Is that dream, this necessity of life, this heirloom, this divine gift something to aspire to?

If power can be a dream to aspire to, why not freedom? Has it been done before? Yes, twice. Then let it be done once more.