If a law is struck down as unconstitutional, isn't that prima facie evidence that the politicians who voted for, signed, and executed that law are failing to uphold their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution? - The Great Awakening

509

If a law is struck down as unconstitutional, isn't that prima facie evidence that the politicians who voted for, signed, and executed that law are failing to uphold their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution?

posted 2 years ago by king07828 2 years ago by king07828 +511 / -2

Where's the prison time and excommunication for politicians that violate their oaths?

58 comments

58 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (58)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Jhorn85 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

It's not the job of the legislature to determine what is constitutional and what is not. It's the job of the supreme court.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– redtoe-skipper 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

O yes it is. That is why there is an oath of office. This comes down to intent. Scotus is merely meant as a fail-safe

Set in a graph any representative, any senator, any governor, any president, and first consider yourself what you deem is constitutional. Then compare to what the Scotus holds to be constitutional. You' ll be amazed for two reasons:

The blatant rift between those who call themselves representatives of the people
The blatant rift between the valuation of law by the people vs the valuation of law by the BAR-MEMBERS.

Your equity is totally irrelevant since November '99.

Is it not interesting that the final say would be those who are beholden to a private City of London based temple?

And you want to continue this farce?

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q