OMG I can't stand so called truthers and researchers that believe they live on a spinning ball of water... Your either 1. Are incapable of free thinking and using logic and reasoning.... OR 2. A shill who either gets paid to spread disinfo or 3. brainwashed AF... Not sure what one is worse
Are incapable of free thinking and using logic and reasoning
Every time I offer evidence for the "spinning ball of water" theory to a FE I get crickets. For example:
How does one explain the fact that boats go over the horizon? People say "its the vanishing point" like its somehow proven because one C_A agent put out a document that said it is. I've lived near the ocean for decades. I've seen it happen myself countless times. Is my own personal experience "brainwashing"? You can throw a stone and find a thousand videos and experiments that show it.
How about Foucault's pendulum? Not one single FE'er has ever had a response to that other than "its a lie," as if that is a reasonable rebuttal to anything. Foucault's pendulum is not about the Earth as a sphere, but the model of what a pendulum would do on a spinning sphere. The precession of the pendulum is accurately predicted by your latitude. I have performed the experiment myself. Here is someone else doing a similar experiment. Anyone can set up this experiment.
A shill who either gets paid to spread disinfo
People that disagree with you and present evidence to the contrary of your beliefs are not "shills", they are people who disagree with you and present evidence to the contrary of your beliefs. Treat them as such by addressing the specifics of their arguments with your own evidence and logical arguments.
brainwashed AF
I don't give a fuck what the truth is. I follow the evidence. I have offered two arguments that have never been reasonably rebutted. I'll settle for just one. Show me how Foucault pendulum experiments can be correct on a flat earth with some sort of physical explanation (preferably with math as well) and I will consider your rebuttal.
I'm not an FE enthusiast by any means, but I think they said in a recent piece the horizon/ship could be seen with a flat lens (no fish eye) Nikon-900 camera (90x zoom or something I think they said)- after it 'disappeared' over the horizon when he zoomed in you could still see it- same with the sun after it had gone 'below the horizon'- zoom in flat lensed and up it popped! Thought I was seeing things.
I can't address any other points I'm afraid fren, it really was a very quick segue from usual research, it just stuck in my noggin for some reason.
Not trying to rock the boat (as it were), nor argue a convincing standpoint on FE, just thought it may interest you.
OMG I can't stand so called truthers and researchers that believe they live on a spinning ball of water... Your either 1. Are incapable of free thinking and using logic and reasoning.... OR 2. A shill who either gets paid to spread disinfo or 3. brainwashed AF... Not sure what one is worse
Every time I offer evidence for the "spinning ball of water" theory to a FE I get crickets. For example:
How does one explain the fact that boats go over the horizon? People say "its the vanishing point" like its somehow proven because one C_A agent put out a document that said it is. I've lived near the ocean for decades. I've seen it happen myself countless times. Is my own personal experience "brainwashing"? You can throw a stone and find a thousand videos and experiments that show it.
How about Foucault's pendulum? Not one single FE'er has ever had a response to that other than "its a lie," as if that is a reasonable rebuttal to anything. Foucault's pendulum is not about the Earth as a sphere, but the model of what a pendulum would do on a spinning sphere. The precession of the pendulum is accurately predicted by your latitude. I have performed the experiment myself. Here is someone else doing a similar experiment. Anyone can set up this experiment.
People that disagree with you and present evidence to the contrary of your beliefs are not "shills", they are people who disagree with you and present evidence to the contrary of your beliefs. Treat them as such by addressing the specifics of their arguments with your own evidence and logical arguments.
I don't give a fuck what the truth is. I follow the evidence. I have offered two arguments that have never been reasonably rebutted. I'll settle for just one. Show me how Foucault pendulum experiments can be correct on a flat earth with some sort of physical explanation (preferably with math as well) and I will consider your rebuttal.
How do you explain how the 80 mile long suez canal was dug without calculating for earth curvature
OK, a few thoughts on this.
I don't give a fuck. I have presented arguments against FE and again, no one is willing to address my arguments.
How do you?
Why do you think it wasn't?
The evidence suggests it was first dug a very long time ago by people who knew just as much about such things as we do now.
I'm not an FE enthusiast by any means, but I think they said in a recent piece the horizon/ship could be seen with a flat lens (no fish eye) Nikon-900 camera (90x zoom or something I think they said)- after it 'disappeared' over the horizon when he zoomed in you could still see it- same with the sun after it had gone 'below the horizon'- zoom in flat lensed and up it popped! Thought I was seeing things.
I can't address any other points I'm afraid fren, it really was a very quick segue from usual research, it just stuck in my noggin for some reason.
Not trying to rock the boat (as it were), nor argue a convincing standpoint on FE, just thought it may interest you.