Do you think the same “freedom of choice” argument should be extended to Fentanyl?
Imagine if Fentanyl producers had a multi-trillion dollar asset sheet.. and owned every major news network.. and every major politician and bureaucrat that actively suppressed and potentially murdered scientists speaking out against the dangers of even occasional fentanyl usage, much less mandated usage.
The point being that the “freedom of choice” argument doesn’t deal with the root issue which is that it the government is responsible for the false choice. We should be free to take ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine but the government squelched that really quick, didn’t they?
Do you think the same “freedom of choice” argument should be extended to Fentanyl?
Imagine if Fentanyl producers had a multi-trillion dollar asset sheet.. and owned every major news network.. and every major politician and bureaucrat that actively suppressed and potentially murdered scientists speaking out against the dangers of even occasional fentanyl usage, much less mandated usage.
The point being that the “freedom of choice” argument doesn’t deal with the root issue which is that it the government is responsible for the false choice. We should be free to take ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine but the government squelched that really quick, didn’t they?