I sense that White Hats are working hard at present to simulate internal division, part of which requires a varied narrative. When a missile locks onto target, a plane (or ship) may send out decoys (shrapnel, flares etc.) to distract the incoming threat, so it ends up destroying itself.
There is value in being unpredictable. Just ask AOC. It increases the difficulty of "locking onto target." Consider recent squabbles that do not appear to make a lot of sense:
- Lin Wood vs. Gen. Flynn
- Lin vs. Kyle
- Trump on the vax (while this is likely multi-dimensional it plays here as well)
- Lin vs. MTG (a "communist" no less!)
- Now Cruz comes out and claims to support the "police" re. J6. (My guess is he is setting the stage for his next confrontation with the real coup-man AG Garland).
There are many more potential examples out there. However, the point is that all of these makes it increasingly difficult for the enemy to pin us down. When there is NO variation among White Hats, it is very easy for the MSM to pin a narrative. Being one-dimensional while employing a monotone is a likely death sentence in politics (unless of course you are a Liberal and get the full support of evil).
Trump employed this strategy frequently in the WH. He would bring in individuals just to generate controversy, fire them, and use the attention created to deflect against potentially more damaging incoming attacks. Similar to controlled opposition (Alex Jones & the Radical Left), the effect is to achieve a degree of control over the incoming attack, where before there was none.
Yes, this is how I view it. If we are confused then so is the enemy. Trump knows this.
"Diversity is our strength."
Ok smarty pants. Lets try to clarify a few things, ok?
==> Thus your question is misleading and not really applicable to anything we are doing here. This applies even on obvious issues, such as the clear and unmistakable premise, for instance, that our nation's political decline can be traced directly to the legalization of abortion. Legalized murder undercut any claims to legitimacy as the rule of law no longer meant anything. However, even this clear, unmistakable link vis-a-vis the social order cannot be "provded" in the way you are asking. My recommendation if you want "proof" go back to Disneyland, where the characters all have fairytale endings and the witch always (usually at least) dies in the end. Ok? I sincerely hope that helps.
We shall see. That may very well be the case. However, my only question would then be, why now? Why bring this out now, when most of us viewed Gen Flynn as a likely Q candidate? Something about the timing, right before the Tribunals begin to break, seems a bit off to me. Again just a hunch based upon an observation.
Interesting, thanks!
Controlled opp to make us all look stupid she is imo
You got freemasonry on the brain.stop in dont act wierd and meet them