Your response comes across as snarky. By way of a direct response, all of the information is open source meaning you can find it, assuming one searches. Is it my responsibility to find it for you? No
Essentially what we are doing here is sharing information. See something you like, use it (or search further). But don't attack or criticize someone who has done their homework when you clearly have not.
I have credibility questions myself. I'll go a step further than "how do you know" but why do you know? Clearly you read something, but that kind of stuff isn't exactly disseminated to the public and there are measures in place to prevent leaks like that when ongoing threats are anticipated. If I was tasked to destroy people like us the first thing I would do is feed you outlandish claims to eviscerate any trust you may have built. On a similar note think about all of "plans" you may read about. If a mission was leaked to the letter I can guarantee it would be a plan no longer.
Well I did and I don't really appreciate that line of thinking. You can end up doing more harm than good for our cause when people blindly take what is said here as fact and run with it. There's really no excuse to not include a source, and it ultimately boils down to carelessness, if you intend on sharing those thoughts. I'm not exactly sure if the post you made was intended to come across as "Fuck you just trust me" but it certainly reads that way.
sauce for literally anything youve said?
I will compose a separate post for that...you will see it soon. Thanks for your observations.
Your response comes across as snarky. By way of a direct response, all of the information is open source meaning you can find it, assuming one searches. Is it my responsibility to find it for you? No
Essentially what we are doing here is sharing information. See something you like, use it (or search further). But don't attack or criticize someone who has done their homework when you clearly have not.
Thanks, fren
I have credibility questions myself. I'll go a step further than "how do you know" but why do you know? Clearly you read something, but that kind of stuff isn't exactly disseminated to the public and there are measures in place to prevent leaks like that when ongoing threats are anticipated. If I was tasked to destroy people like us the first thing I would do is feed you outlandish claims to eviscerate any trust you may have built. On a similar note think about all of "plans" you may read about. If a mission was leaked to the letter I can guarantee it would be a plan no longer.
I would encourage you to read my recently submitted post re. "sauce". You may (or may not) find it helpful. I hope you will. Thanks for your feedback.
Well I did and I don't really appreciate that line of thinking. You can end up doing more harm than good for our cause when people blindly take what is said here as fact and run with it. There's really no excuse to not include a source, and it ultimately boils down to carelessness, if you intend on sharing those thoughts. I'm not exactly sure if the post you made was intended to come across as "Fuck you just trust me" but it certainly reads that way.