The Dates And Comms Of The British Royal Family
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Looks like Georgy boy wasn't quick enough and needed a 'hand' to make his numbers fit:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8650635/Queen-grandfather-King-George-V-EUTHANISED.html
Great work by the way fren, all the numerical wizardry made my head spin a bit...
Wow, WOW! That's reveal is an earthquake. I knew he was murdered just by the dates, but I never thought they'd admit it. It was clearly murder because they needed him dead on that date. 366 days later FDR is the first US president inaugurated on January 20th. And it's January 20th, 1937.
I was one massive comm that they had control of the US and now they could begin World War 2.
George 5th loyally served the deep state and they sacrificed him in the end for their schemes. George the 6th was also likely a "sacrifice" to bring Elizabeth to power on the right date. Those dates matter and they make sure it happens when they want it to happen.
I'd known about the idea of it for a while- your post jogged the noggin into having a look and there it was... I must say I didn't believe it at the time, still snoozing at that point. Daily Mail with the comms confirm as usual.
So was the US WW2 role decided then? If so, I suppose that shouldn't be so much of a surprise, I'm sure you've seen the number plate comms on the Franz Ferdinand vehicle in WW1, armistice day plate:
https://news.sky.com/story/a-ii-ii-18-franz-ferdinands-prophetic-number-plate-11551176
Aces and eights, 'dead man's hand',
I didn't know about aces and eights being a dead man's hand. That does explain the love of 18s (and the mirror 81) in comms. Look at the dates on several of the royals.
Tbh, my money on the date they'll announce Queen Liz II has kicked the bucket is 212. Her coronation and the date she became queen match Victoria with the "6/2" comm (which is another way to say double sixes or 66).
There are 33 days between when Queen Elizabeth II was born (4/21) and when Queen Victoria was born (5/24). 33 comms. Freemasons love their 33s. QE1 is clearly paired to Queen Victoria comms.
Victoria died on 122. "212" (February 12th) is an anagram of 122. Also 2/12 is 6 days after the death of George the 6th (Elizabeth's father) on 2/6 and when Elizabeth became queen.
So I feel like that's the date. Just speculating tho.
Thanks though on the aces and eights. That explains a whole bunch of the 1818 comms I've seen.
Apparently the dead man's hand is:
Notice the Q? It should be Queen, but it's the 17.
This lines up with my previous post about the Victorian era and how it became where they developed a lot of these highly sophisticated comms:
https://greatawakening.win/p/140w2RGTsz/origin-of-comms-communication-hi/c/
13 is the 6th prime number and thus gets pegged as "unlucky".
17 is the 7th prime number if you count "2" as a prime and thus it could be a "lucky" number in that case.
However in the Mersenne system, 17 is the 6th prime number (2 is removed as an even).
It became huge in the Victorian era to believe that certain dates and numbers had great mystical power. This all made it easy to coordinate events and perpetuate this "mysticism" among the non-comms aware by following these number systems.
If you change every letter in "Joe Biden" to its corresponding numerical value then all the letters add up to 64. That mirrors as "46". He is also the 46th "(p)resident".
Corona's letters add up to 66. (6 + 6 = 12) Which is why 12 can also be a comm for "66" which can be an abbreviation for "666" just like a regular 6 can.
Numbers matter a lot. Numerology is not because of supernatural forces, but because of its use in coordinating dates for "events".
Wow, thanks for that. I must say I get a little lost with the workings out of these things when it comes to numbers. If it came to putting together something like this, I see the pattern when you lay it out but there's no way I could arrive there by my own volition.
That said, patterns/numbers occasionally jump out (and if I read your numerical work enough times over it helps to spot more). I guess a lot of this is practice, but my mind wanders when I try and give it numbers... not easy to overcome.
Fantastic work as always fren, if I stumble across any nuggets (which are usually prompted by your decodes to be honest) I'll continue to pass them on while still not fully grasping the significance of aforementioned nuggets... Kek, I'm trying...