Meanings are often implied. Your response was not one of support but rather of 'adamant correction'. You could have written, ' you are correct, and btw add the following etc. etc. You did not. Rather, you launched out into a vituperative rebuke. What exactly were you seeking to correct? To you--and those who share your views--the Epstein-MOSSAD connection is important as indicating something much deeper. As I pointed out, using logic not emotions, in the era of global intel it means nothing. Epstein may have got his start with MOSSAD, but even if so, the CIA is on part if not much deeper in the global abduction ring than MOSSAD. Is the US evil? I will leave that for you to decide.
However it is clear that your point was to correct. Correct what? That seems pretty clear.
Brother I respect the fact that we disagree on what is for many a controversial topic and yet there was no name calling by either party. Go in peace! Have a great day.
Where did I say any of that?
Meanings are often implied. Your response was not one of support but rather of 'adamant correction'. You could have written, ' you are correct, and btw add the following etc. etc. You did not. Rather, you launched out into a vituperative rebuke. What exactly were you seeking to correct? To you--and those who share your views--the Epstein-MOSSAD connection is important as indicating something much deeper. As I pointed out, using logic not emotions, in the era of global intel it means nothing. Epstein may have got his start with MOSSAD, but even if so, the CIA is on part if not much deeper in the global abduction ring than MOSSAD. Is the US evil? I will leave that for you to decide.
However it is clear that your point was to correct. Correct what? That seems pretty clear.
🤣
Brother I respect the fact that we disagree on what is for many a controversial topic and yet there was no name calling by either party. Go in peace! Have a great day.