Monte's 10 Foot Planisphere of 1587
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
I'm assuming you know how those work, op? In the 3 dimension?
There isn't anything odd about it. If anything is a damn good and accurate portrayal considering the era and lack of computer rendering.
Well to tell you how inaccurate current maps are, france is actually massive. Yet it looks tiny on a map. Something isnt right.
That style of map isn't just a flat erf drawing.
Its a distorted view.
If you looked a the top of the globe, and peeled the bottom (antarctica) in wedges outward, with the artic in the middle, there would be big gaps on the outside all around. (Like a dart board)
This style of map, instead of having gaps, distorts the entire thing.
The inner part is drawn pinched and the outer is stretched.
All flat erfers need to think about is longitudes and day night cycles. That'll nip ot real quick.
Shit, if the day is let's say, exactly 12 hours at the equator, then one pole would have probably 24 hour days and 24 hour nights and the other pole probably 24 hour days only.
Or if they say the sun revolve around the back side of the flat earth, then there would be artic/antarcic winter and summer cycles that alternate. 6 months of day/ night
Wow. Spoken like a true flat erfer. Why are you here, literally nobody belives that shit.
Planes follow prevailing winds and known aerial traffic lines.
Scale doesn't mean anything. If the sun is smaller and but closer, how does that change ANYTHING? It doesn't, aside from the planets between us are smaller too.
And before you say 'but planet contains the word plane proving erfs flat'.
It's the fucking galaxy that's a plane.
A planet or 'planette' a is something small (ette, ito) orbiting that plane.
Oh yeah...
https://qagg.news/?read=2622
Remind me why your on a Q board if Q explicitly said the earth is NOT flat?