If MJ12 has questionable reputation, wouldn't the message be tainted?

I didn't want to make this post about MJ12. Message over messenger is important.

"Fauci is cornered, the end is soon" implies insider knowledge.

Not necessarily. Anyone following the proceedings between Rand Paul and Fauci can tell that he is squirming like the rat he is. Fauci's body language alone is evidence enough that he is completely uncomfortable with his position, and powerless to do anything about it. When Fauci falls, the entire COVID narrative falls. This, if nothing else, is certain.

"Every witness being questioned is a communist" implies insider knowledge. The screenshot email, presented at face value, is deception.

You don't have to be an insider to know that we have communist agents infesting every level of our society. I think this point is more of a given than a matter of insider knowledge. Anyone who goes along with this scheme is a traitor to their own country, and hence can be assumed to be working for the only country that stands to gain anything from this bioterrorism; that country being China, the last bastion of communism on Earth.

The message it attempts to convey is "Fauci was communicating with people on how to create a bioweapon", when the email was certainly satire.

Whether the e-mail was satire has yet to be determined. That information would certainly require insider knowledge to verify or refute. Seeing as the very topic of COVID being a bioterror weapon is taboo in the media at the moment, I don't think we are likely to get a definitive and truthful answer one way or the other until the curtains fall and Q lays the cards on the table.

Copying Q's posting style when communicating to the Q community is an attempt to hijack the good will and reputation that Q has built, in order to make statements sound authoritative when it's just some guy making guesses.

MJ12 actually began posting on twitter before Q did in early 2017. Again, I didn't want this post to turn into a debate on MJ12. Message over messenger.

It would have been much better to convey the points as an anon and let people discuss them, rather than lay out the points as though they are authoritative fact (when they're not).

I give credit where credit is due. We can still discuss the points presented without debating over the messenger.

"The end is soon". We could be looking at the 2024 election before things start to get fixed. No one knows.

Given that we are fighting a 6000 year old death cult, I'd say 2024 is very soon in the larger scope of our grand timeline. I am thankful that I am among the few living that will see these events unfold in their lifetime. Our ancestors dreamed of witnessing the events that we will get to see.

I hope everyone can tell the difference between hoping the nightmare ends soon vs stating it definitely end soon, as an authoritative fact.

Soon is a measurement of time which gives way to dates. Patience anon! Events are far more important than dates. We are close to the end, in that we are only a few events away from the closure of this war. These last few events could take place over weeks, months, or years. Time is relative. The events will unfold regardless. In that regard, the end is soon and the end is certain.

It's because it's bullshit. It's a nothingburger. Bunch of vague nonsense to get low IQ monkeys to start chimping out.