So if Ivermectin and Hydroxy are both known therapeutics for the coof, doesn't that negate the EUA's for all vaccines?
(media.greatawakening.win)
⚠️ Vax-TYRANNY ☠️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (116)
sorted by:
What you and u/SgtPepper29 are missing is that vaccines aren't labeled as treatments or "curatives" - i.e. they aren't things you treat someone with after they've fallen ill, as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are (see: picture). Any physician in the world can explain you that.
Instead, vaccines fall under the label of prophylactic - i.e. they prevent or lessen the effects of a future infection. There are very few exceptions and edge cases (when a vaccine is a treatment rather than a prophylatic) such as some specific cancers.
But the NIH released a paper back in 2005 (I think) which showed that hydroxy was an effective prophylactic as well as treatment.
Hydroxychloroquine is both a prophylactic and a treatment, just in different doses and concentrations (and accompanied by zinc and a couple other things).