my understanding: doctor's establishment is the only body that are onbord en mass. They never questioned: Virus is natural? No therapeutics? PCR test is the right tool? (asymptomatic? common flu disappear?) Infections rate? With 80% asymptomatic or common flu? Deadly protocol? survival rate 99,98? Never found a sample of coronavirus? mask mandate work? Lockdown good? Vaccine passport necessary? Vaccine mandate for all ? Vaccine ingredients not known? Vaccine side effects not related? Vaccine deaths not fully vaxxed? If not enough they discredited all the scientists speaking the truth against them narrative. What a nice community 🐷 I think the court just said: You are the body trying to mandate the vaccine for all, so bc you are the responsable body, you'll try first. I see logic here. Let's wait a little. Good luck doctors
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
There was an interesting take on the decision in todays Coffee and Covid newsletter.
“Judges love “baby splitting.” The term refers to that old story about King Solomon where he suggested the solution of cutting a live baby in two to find out who the real mother was. But that’s not what it means in present vernacular. It just means that judges like to give both parties something, to divide the decision somehow, so that nobody’s completely happy but — more importantly — nobody’s completely left high-and-dry and outraged at the judge.”
This is the link to access: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-learn-how-to-get-involved-