I'm 28 years old. I spent the past 4 years at an Ivy-league medical school. I couldn't have been more excited to be a doctor when I first arrived on campus. Then, slowly, the truth became more and more apparent to me. I refused to swallow the dogma just because that was what was being taught in class, and always went to the primary research to see if what they were selling was truly accurate. And what I found was worse than I could ever have imagined. It would take multiple textbooks to fully articulate my feelings about the profession, but I'll try to summarize as best as I can below the horrors of healthcare in the US.
-
The healthcare industry in the US is explicitly designed to suck as much money as possible out of people suffering from disease. It is the #1 cause of bankruptcy in the US. Insurance companies and pharma are protected by law in charging truly obscene prices for drugs that have been around for decades. If the patent runs out, they add a single change to the drug and re-patent it. This can be as fucking stupid as combining two drugs or changing the carrier the drug is delivered in. Drugs that should be priced in the $5-$20 range are routinely gouging innocent Americans for thousands of dollars. Many of the drugs are completely ineffective or even harmful and yet are routinely prescribed because they are "approved" and are literally bankrupting our nation and individual citizens.
-
The "healthcare" industry is perfectly designed to keep you a customer for life. At one of the "best" medical schools in the country, we not only received next to no education about nutrition or lifestyle in our entire curriculum. I'm here to tell you to your face that the biggest killers (biggest $$$) in the US are 90% due to nutrition and ARE 100% REVERSIBLE. Obesity, Type II diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, arthritis, and high cholesterol (don't even get me started. Statins are a COMPLETE scam and are the most profitable drugs in medicine) are DUE TO WHAT YOU EAT . The diabetes and heart associations promote diets that will ensure you have your condition forever. The "heart-healthy" oils promoted by the AHA in the supermarket are the highly inflammatory oils that cause heart disease. Same goes with the ADA and sugar recommendations. Many cancers should also be included in the preventable and reversible category, but say that as a doctor and you'll be ostracized. I'll give you a ~very~ quick lesson that should make your jaw drop. Your body develops microcancers (genetically defective cells) ALL THE TIME. Your innate immune system recognizes these defective cells and deals with them on a daily basis. What does "Modern" medicine do when they find a cancer? THEY WIPE OUT YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM WITH CHEMO. No matter what they say, I promise you there are other ways to treat cancer besides chemo, surgery, and radiation, but this is all the profession has to offer because they can't charge for natural immune boosts and dietary changes. It is disgusting beyond comprehension. (I will caveat here that there are a few subtypes of cancer that do respond well to chemo. the vast majority do not, and the side effects are brutal).
-
Without going to deep into the history of the profession, I'll just say that the main reason doctors don't wake up to the two above facts is because they are put into immense debt, and forced under pressure and shaming to learn MOUNTAINS of biochemical pathways, mechanisms, drug interactions etc that put them in a panic/fear state and as such they keep their heads down and simply regurgitate what they are taught. They also are routinely forced to work 80-100 hours a week for years on end during residency and literally go into survival mode where you just do what you're told so you won't ruffle any feathers after giving up 8+ years of your life to become a doctor. If you want to do a deeper dive, you can look into the Rockefeller takeover of allopathic medicine via the Flexner report and other mechanisms.
-
This wouldn't be a proper post without the most relevant topic of all today - VACCINES. Again, a full exploration would be an entire book, but I cannot stress to you how unbelievably disgusting the data is when you actually look at it. Vaccines are almost never tested against placebo, they always are compared to other vaccines so no harmful effects will be found. THIS IS NOT SCIENCE. The FDA and CDC have been fully compromised for decades. Pharma is the biggest lobby in the US. How difficult do you think it is to buy the few dozen voters at these agencies? It was done a long time ago. I'll say it right to your face. Many of the childhood vaccines are 100% 100% 100% 100% causing neurodevelopmental disorders including autism, severe autoimmune disorders and allergies that will make these children dependent on the healthcare industry for their entire lives. The rates are SKYROCKETING, the link is obvious and admitted by top officials, and it is literally one of the biggest threats to humankind's future. 1 in 33 children is being diagnosed with SEVERE developmental disorders, up from 1 in 10,000 in the 70s. The mechanistic link to vaccines is clear. THEY LITERALLY TEACH US IN MEDICAL SCHOOL THAT IT IS NORMAL FOR INFANTS TO HAVE FEBRILE SEIZURES. I'M NOT KIDDING. Listen to the parents who describe their perfectly normal kids who had febrile seizures post-vaccination and became severely delayed many times to the point of inability to speak, read, or write. You need to do your own research. You can listen to documentaries including vaxxed and others where top CDC officials admit straight up that they covered up direct evidence of harm because they were told to. Further, if you actually look at the history of many of the diseases which they are now vaccinating kids for, the incidence rates in the US had already fallen by 90-99% due to water chlorination and other sanitation improvements well before the vaccines were introduced. Some particularly disgusting examples are the Hep B vaccine (given to all newborns ON THE DAY THEY ARE BORN) despite evidence of brain inflammation, and the fact that hep B is a bloodborne illness that can't even be caught by babies (unless their mother is positive which is rare) and their antibodies wane before the age at which they would ever be at risk anyways due to needles or sexual intercourse. It's SICK. HPV vaccine data is also so hilariously bad it really makes me question on a daily basis how this world we live in is possibly real. RFK Jr did an amazing expose on this vaccine in particular years ago if you are interested. Of course the brainwashing is so complete in medical school that you will be INSTANTLY ostracized if you speak out.
I honestly could keep going. The journals are compromised by pharma (editors of top journals quitting and saying straight up their journals have been compromised. Female editor of the NEJM wrote a particularly good piece about this), the ways in which studies are designed and performed are explicitly to make them look better than they are and to cover up adverse events. Choosing poor placebos, limiting follow-up time, testing healthy populations so the results will look better than reality, among 100 other ways they manipulate the trials.
Food, water, soil, and air (all 4) in this country contains poisons from Industry and the government does nothing about it. If you want me to go deeper into this topic in particular, DM me.
When you have done the literally thousands of hours of research into the reality of healthcare as I have done, some of what is going on currently makes more sense, although it is enough to make anyone on earth cry. Pharma control was so entrenched, doctors so brainwashed, and the population so dumbed down that it literally might have taken something as disgusting as the covid vaccine (worse than normal vaccines which are already bad by at least 2 to 3 orders of magnitude) to wake the population up. It breaks my heart. but maybe, just maybe, it will bring down the empire of lies.
If any of you have any questions about anything I wrote or want more direction, I'm always open to talk.
TLDR: spent 4 years in a top medical school to become a doctor. Left it all behind because the reality is so, so, so much worse than you could ever have imagined.
Is the concept of vaccination valid, but has been perverted by the pharmaceutical industry? Or is the entire concept bullshit?
You mention that vaccines are not measured against placebos, but against other vaccines (I assume you mean in terms of side effects?). Logically the earlier vaccines that were invented didn't have this luxury. Are there any truly "safe and effective" vaccines?
The direct cost and opportunity cost of your four years of medical school must have been immense. Was it difficulty to turn away or was it a no brainer despite the financial incentives to stay?
These are all great questions.
My opinion is that the theoretical concept of vaccination is certainly valid. I believe the best case for a vaccine is against clearly debilitating diseases which also have a low mutation rate. For example just google images of smallpox to get an idea of how terrible it can be. So for extreme diseases like that, the risk/benefit likely makes sense. It's also important to note that there are many different kinds of vaccines and adjuvants (the part of the vaccine that stimulates your immune system into producing antibodies) that range from relatively safe to clearly dangerous (spike mRNA "Vaccine"). The problems start arising because the financial incentives for vaccines are so large that they started going after less and less deadly and debilitating diseases, as well as diseases like influenza viruses and coronaviruses which mutate so rapidly that the vaccines rarely work well anyways.
I believe there are definitely some vaccines where the benefits outweigh the risks. However as I said above I think the profit incentive pushed pharma into diseases where they are WAYYY out over their toes and don't truly understand the long-term consequences of their vaccines. For example the HPV vaccine (guardasil) theoretically prevents cervical cancer except they give it to 13 year olds and the average age of a cervical cancer diagnosis is 55 years old. So they literally have zero proof it prevents cervical cancer, and there are known autoimmune and blood disorders caused by that product. It was also tested against the meningitis vaccine instead of placebo, and the meningitis vaccine is also known to have a small but known risk of adverse events. It's in situations like that where I think pharma is behaving in a manner that is completely against the Hippocratic oath.
It was very difficult. It was my career path for a long-time, I didn't have a planned alternative, and like you said I had already committed significant money and time. It was also very difficult trying to explain to family and friends why I couldn't go through with it. However despite all of this, in a way it was still a no-brainer for me personally, especially as covid started heating up and hospitals refused to treat patients w/ generic drugs + forced a clearly unsafe product on adults and children alike. Luckily things have worked out and I have capitalized on some opportunities in other areas, which has been very fortunate for me, but it certainly wasn't easy committing to the decision to leave.
In my late forties I realized that the "truth" of my twenties had all been superceded and the "studies" which were gospel were now anathema. That was discouraging, you saved yourself and your patients years of malpractice by quitting early. I went back to school specifically to study research methods in general so that I could be informed about these "studies" that rule our lives. Very worthwhile use of time. The academic world is just as twisted as the medical world. They are also driven by money. Money comes from grants. Grants come with strings. Negative results aren't published and don't generate more grants. Not being published means not advancing academically and the same with not bringing in grant revenue, no tenure. It all works together.
yep, I worked in an academic lab so I was also exposed to just how absurd the funding mechanisms were there as well. All controlled. Nothing controversial or ground-breaking is funded. I literally worked in one of the biggest cancer labs in the country looking at Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (spoiler: they didn't work too well. one good use case in CML), and next door to our lab was an incredible scientist who wanted to study how to stimulate the immune system to kill cancer without harming the patient with chemo. His lab was completely empty and he couldn't get funded. You really can't make this stuff up.
At least you did the right thing and realized you had to go back to properly inform yourself. So many doctors (including many in my family) refuse to acknowledge they can be wrong and thus prolong the problems and poor care.
Inertia is highly underrated. Seriously, an alternative research model is necessary to break into this problem.
I believe cancer was cured 70 years ago (the treatment killed the cancer cell). Dr Royal Rife. I believe he invented the dark field microscope ( it could actually see live cancer cells).
I've been researching the history of vaccination and was dumbfounded by what I read. From the NIH's National Library of Medicine: We hypothesize that the AIDS pandemic may have originated with a contaminated polio vaccine that was administered to inhabitants of Equatorial Africa from 1957 to 1959. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7935079/
The WHO estimates that 33 million people have died from AIDS and the NIH hypothesizes it likely came from a contaminated vaccine, yet the "safe and effective" narrative should not be questioned.
The U.S. version of the polio vaccine was contaminated with Simian Virus 40 which is associated with some types of cancer although the medical industry has gone out of its way to say it's only an association, not a direct cause.
We look back at history and scoff at bloodletting and cocaine filled cough syrup. Yet, you're "crazy" to question any modern medical practices. Future generations will look at us and wonder why we poisoned ourselves.
This was one of the most mind blowing theories I’ve read. The investigative article should be a staple for everyone to read.
I had a hard time believing it. And the article on the NIH's website is dated June of 1994! Documentaries about AIDS always claim it was probably due to consumption of bush meat
Bless you for taking the road less traveled... 🙏