-5
Ranlove -5 points ago +8 / -13

This makes me think she would be an honorable and wonderful VP. Clears up the gray areas about her that I often hear on GW. Over one hour long she covers the reason she left the Democrat party.

2
Ranlove 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem is that the medical community has gotten lazy, they just throw pills at the sickness instead of asking the questions that would fix the problem instead of hiding the symptoms. Of course this is because they get a shit load of money for vaccinations and pushing pills from big pharmaceutical industries. Questions like “what’s your lifestyle like, what’s your diet like, do you exercise regularly” etc etc.

1
Ranlove 1 point ago +1 / -0

So according to this video, the masks are damn near flawless. This means that it’s not the masks that they’re using on the poser. Cause these are terrible.

1
Ranlove 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fact that she’s still running and saying that she can bring it home means she’s been told by the deep state she IS going win. Expect some kind of weird election snafu. No proof just a gut feeling …

1
Ranlove 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your correct!! The RDA is WAY too low. It would be impossible to get your levels to 100. I have been taking 15000 IU in the summer and 20000 in the winter here in Houston. My last test blood levels were 160+. I haven’t had my usual strep and allergies since 2019 when I started. No clot shot and a mild case of Covid in 2021. I am 76.

3
Ranlove 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump was going to release data that was going to clear him but then changed his mind to save it for the trial. So what happened to that?

5
Ranlove 5 points ago +5 / -0

The sky is falling the sky is falling!!! More bullshit from the deep state. Please don’t scare us anymore, I’ll do whatever you say. God, I am getting so sick of this BS …

4
Ranlove 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’ve been taking ivermectin for almost 2 years (1 or 2 a week as a precaution) doc said it would keep well after the discard date as long as it’s in a cool dry place. Not sure about freezing. Refrigerator however probably. Hope this helps.

4
Ranlove 4 points ago +4 / -0

And yet we still see dumb asses wearing masks …

4
Ranlove 4 points ago +4 / -0

This obviously was after he got fired ( he said so), but reading him says he refused to lie for his job at FOX, and this speech says he retained his self respect and told FOX to pound sand. But the subject of the speech and the message was right on!

1
Ranlove 1 point ago +1 / -0

This has to be fake, as the questions are mostly softball. The question about Taylor Swift … would that really be asked? Would a transcript really be leaked on such an important interview? I think not!

1
Ranlove 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone get the King some ivermectin. <Grin> No … Really!

3
Ranlove 3 points ago +3 / -0

Natural Born Citizen. What did the founders mean? How does that requirement affect the president Obama and those running for that office. By RA Love 2016 I'm often stunned to hear officials and lay people try to re-define the meaning of NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. This phrase appears in the constitution as part of the requirements for the President and Vice President. Article II Section 1.5 states: No person except a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States. The statement seems pretty clear except for the first line up to the comma. We need to define NATURAL BORN CITIZEN and what the founders meant by "or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution",. Lets tackle the last part of the line first: "or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution,." Quite simply this lets the founders and other men of age (at that time) to be eligible for the office. Without this wordings there could be no one elected as president because at that time there was no person that fit the definition of Natural Born Citizen ( in the new United States). As part of that definition you had to be a citizen of the United States for 14 years. Because the republic was brand new, the founders were saying that if you were a citizen at the time of the adoption of the document then you were eligible. Now lets take a look at the part in question NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Natural Born Citizen is an interesting phrase. The thought that the framers would use that term for it just to mean a citizen born naturally by natural birth seems strange, as birth and natural born were most likely assumed at the time. So, it must mean something special. The framers new that in order to have a union that was secure and free from outside influence such as elected officials that might be influenced by forigen governments, they had to make sure that the founding documents had some written provision that excluded outside influence. Therefore the term Natural Born Citizen. But what does it actually mean? Before the Constitution the closest reference we have to Natural Born Citizen is from the legal treatise “The Law of Nations,” written by Emerich de Vattel in 1758. In book one chapter 19, iit reads: § 212. Of the citizens and natives. (bold is mine) “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence

Natural Born Citizen. What did the founders mean? of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.” Vattel definies the term quite eloquently. This is the meaning that the founders were referring to. But there is a problem. How are we to know that is what the founders were referring? Vattel was French did any of the founders even speak french as well as read the french language? This from the professional interpreter,dated July 4th 2012: Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, first Secretary of State under Washington, and our third President spoke English, French, Italian, Latin, and he could read Greek, and Spanish. Benjamin Franklin, America’s first diplomat and well-known genius spoke English, French and Italian. Our second President: John Adams spoke English, French and Latin. President James Madison spoke English, Greek, Latin and Hebrew. James Monroe spoke English and French. So there we have it. The only thing we need to do is link the founding fathers with Vattel. In the memoirs, coorispondence and misalanience notes of Thomas Jefferson volume 3, Jefferson quotes Vattel in French. He refers to Vattel as an elightened an disinterested judge. This to any should be the final nail in the coffin, however many still are deaf blind and dumb. This by eather by design or ignorance is the crux of the matter. For there can be no doubt of the meaning of the term and what the founders were trying to say. We can also be of no doubt the POTUS (Obama) was never qualified to be president. By his own admission his father was a british subject. Obama's qualification to be president was overlooked on purpose by the democrats and the wording of the document for his qualification was altered just slightly so as to look like it conformed to the constitutional requirements. Nancy Pelosi was right in the middle of the entire conspriacy. This would have been a simple problem to resolve. However our senators, representatives and yes even the Supreme Court refuses to address the issue. The complicit main stream press continues to ignore every piece of evidence licking the boots of the usurper Obama. The 2016 elections: Ted Cruz was born in Canada. His mother was an American citizen at the time of his birth but his father was not. His father later became a citizen. This is not what Vattel was saying. Naturalized citizen is not part of the narrative. Ted Cruz by Definition of natural born citizen is not eligible to be president.

5
Ranlove 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sarge: “Where is secretary Austin soldier?” Soldier: “Sir Blown up Sir!”

4
Ranlove 4 points ago +4 / -0

The way I remember the dose was many times what the hazard was for the HCQ. I other words the patients in the study were over dosed, plus were already compromised in order to kill the use of HCQ, so the vaccines could be issued. If there was a medicine that would have efficacy for Covid then the vax couldn’t have an emergency authorization.

6
Ranlove 6 points ago +6 / -0

Didn’t Trump kick Epstein out of his casino when Epstein tried to bring in a underaged girl?

view more: Next ›