ADA requires a company to offer an accommodation for not performing a 'duty' (the jab) if the duty is not essential to the existence of the job. Would the job not exist but for this specific duty (the jab)? Why couldn't the accommodation be 'masking up' as opposed to termination.
ADA requires a company to offer an accommodation for not performing a 'duty' (the jab) if the duty is not essential to the existence of the job. Would the job not exist but for this specific duty (the jab)? Why couldn't the accommodation be 'masking up' as opposed to termination.