Read the article. GP is pointing out that the person who made the tweet was intentionally misrepresenting Hannity and McEnany. The OP here either didn't read it or is intentionally spreading a hit piece on McEnany.
I read that story last night. Of course they were released to hurt Hannity and McEnany. But nowhere does it say the tweets were false or made up. This is what she said. I think she has some explaining to do. Like I said, don't trust ANYONE on Fox.
"Hannity texted Kayleigh a five point plan for talking to Trump on January 7th
Two of the points:
No more stolen election talk
Yes, impeachment and the 25th amendment are real, and many people will quit
Kayleigh responds with “Love that. Thank you. That is the playbook” pic.twitter.com/PqOeG6ZWTb"
GP's article is about how the J6 committee misconstrued information. The Tweet give no context or direct connect between these comments. This is classic fake news. Without context their comments mean nothing but people hear are falling for it.
Read the article. GP is pointing out that the person who made the tweet was intentionally misrepresenting Hannity and McEnany. The OP here either didn't read it or is intentionally spreading a hit piece on McEnany.
I read that story last night. Of course they were released to hurt Hannity and McEnany. But nowhere does it say the tweets were false or made up. This is what she said. I think she has some explaining to do. Like I said, don't trust ANYONE on Fox.
"Hannity texted Kayleigh a five point plan for talking to Trump on January 7th Two of the points:
GP's article is about how the J6 committee misconstrued information. The Tweet give no context or direct connect between these comments. This is classic fake news. Without context their comments mean nothing but people hear are falling for it.