There was a story a couple of years ago about some congressional sex-abuse coverup fund, where all serving congresspeople pay into some fund thats used to pay hush money to victims.
A quick search - this was unearthed during the 'metoo' thing
In a nutshell, a huge proportion of congress are involved in committing sexual crimes. Maybe not as badly as Schifty, but now you have at least one more reason why he is 'protected' in the same way as epstein/maxwell. Birds of a feather..
i guess I'm having a hard time understanding why the taxpayers have to subsidize bad behavior. if someone else gets to pay for the payoff, whats the incentive for them to NOT do it again?
There was a story a couple of years ago about some congressional sex-abuse coverup fund, where all serving congresspeople pay into some fund thats used to pay hush money to victims.
A quick search - this was unearthed during the 'metoo' thing
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/11/27/sexual-harassment-fund-exposes-congress-editorials-debates/898008001/
In a nutshell, a huge proportion of congress are involved in committing sexual crimes. Maybe not as badly as Schifty, but now you have at least one more reason why he is 'protected' in the same way as epstein/maxwell. Birds of a feather..
i guess I'm having a hard time understanding why the taxpayers have to subsidize bad behavior. if someone else gets to pay for the payoff, whats the incentive for them to NOT do it again?
Zero. That's the plan.