Handshake accounts are SOCIAL CREDIT TACTICS. Because Fauci held the position he held many listened to him and are now suffering. If someone's input is invalidated because of their status, that is SOCIAL CREDIT, if someone's input is validated because of their status, that is SOCIAL CREDIT! You haven't any need to fear your score because you are acting exactly as you should. Can we determine that any updoots are not the result of bots? Should we blindly determine the source of information invalid because the source hasn't enough updoots? See what I mean, yet?
"I spy" doesn't have to link to Susan joining netflix, they were simultaneous infractions on the American Citizen, and the World Citizen conducted at the top levels of our "trusted" institutions.
You are conflating up and down votes on a message board and handshake status to tyrannical social credit systems. That's absurd. You are arguing for the sake of arguing at this point.
The simple up vs downvotes is used as a metric to see a relative measure of how agreeable your statement or comment is amongst the other users of this community.
It does not have an actual bearing on the resources allocated to you as a human being nor are you deprived of resources for a "low performance".
And handshake status is simply to demonstrate that a user is new. Which is mighty helpful when identifying shills, doomers or controlled opposition which are deliberate and real threats to the goals and harmony of these types of online communities. So again, this is nothing actual like a real life social credit system and to conflate it as such is completely disingenuous.
When getting into really cold or hot water, while best to just dive in completely, it is far more comfortable to slowly immerse yourself. While it takes longer to acclimate, the initial shock is far less severe.
I don't give a shit if somebody has a handshake or not. However, if they post garbage and also happen to be a handshake, I refer to them as "handshake."
And I didn't even downvote handshake or you in case you aren't shills and just retarded.
I don't care about upvotes, you big dummy.
"I spy" doesn't have to link to Susan joining netflix, they were simultaneous infractions on the American Citizen, and the World Citizen conducted at the top levels of our "trusted" institutions.
If you want to point to Q Drops based on the time difference between the Obama Tweet and the @Fortbenning Tweet and treat it as a Delta, you absolutely need to show the link. Otherwise, your decode is complete garbage. But you knew that and you probably get paid per reply (or you're just really that retarded)...
Susan Rice was a mirrored drop number. Not directly as this doesn't talk about her but she was working for netflix while this was going on, after having left the WH. Again, I SPY dose not have to have anything to do with Susan rice for it to lead to information relevant to her, and information relevant to what is going on.
What are you really on about?
You seem kind of butt-hurt that NCSWIC, I apologize as I shouldn't talk like that but WHAT GIVES!?
You keep saying that the information isn't relevant but ALL of it IS! Just be glad you got the cliff notes before it went main stream because all of this isn't going to be easy for many to swallow.
You mad because they used days between the I SPY tweets to look for information? If Obama's info is coming out and he had been a part of what netflix was doing while susan was working for them then what difference dose it make how anyone found the information, which was freely provided. DAMN!
EVEN SHOWED THEIR DAMN WORK!!!! COME ON!
@mnpsna is a God send! I couldn't have done it more clean myself. Kind of makes me feel inadequate so thanks for that I guess. lol+
wasn't the SR link # a MIRROR of another drop that was linked? I feel like handshake is probably an insider as I haven't seen many operate like them and they are spot on.
Your first comment to them was something like nice try handshake. COME ON!!!
If he had been way off the rails like some of these people that claim to see their name in the comms or something I could sympathize with you, but honestly you just seem hell bent on debunking decent digging. Because you cannot fathom the link doesn't mean that there isn't one. Nothing that handshake has posted would serve against Q and yet they are being attacked which started with comments about them being a handshake account.
Could it be as simple as both are about to hit mainstream and neither are really the same issue as the other?
Promises made, promises kept is all I see.
My issue is how easily they got everyone to play into the social credit system. As if it hadn't already been implemented years ago. Vested authority isn't new and that is essentially the pinnacle of social credit.
I can tell this is difficult for you.
Handshake accounts are SOCIAL CREDIT TACTICS. Because Fauci held the position he held many listened to him and are now suffering. If someone's input is invalidated because of their status, that is SOCIAL CREDIT, if someone's input is validated because of their status, that is SOCIAL CREDIT! You haven't any need to fear your score because you are acting exactly as you should. Can we determine that any updoots are not the result of bots? Should we blindly determine the source of information invalid because the source hasn't enough updoots? See what I mean, yet?
"I spy" doesn't have to link to Susan joining netflix, they were simultaneous infractions on the American Citizen, and the World Citizen conducted at the top levels of our "trusted" institutions.
You are conflating up and down votes on a message board and handshake status to tyrannical social credit systems. That's absurd. You are arguing for the sake of arguing at this point.
The simple up vs downvotes is used as a metric to see a relative measure of how agreeable your statement or comment is amongst the other users of this community.
It does not have an actual bearing on the resources allocated to you as a human being nor are you deprived of resources for a "low performance".
And handshake status is simply to demonstrate that a user is new. Which is mighty helpful when identifying shills, doomers or controlled opposition which are deliberate and real threats to the goals and harmony of these types of online communities. So again, this is nothing actual like a real life social credit system and to conflate it as such is completely disingenuous.
When getting into really cold or hot water, while best to just dive in completely, it is far more comfortable to slowly immerse yourself. While it takes longer to acclimate, the initial shock is far less severe.
Just a taste, but it's cut from the same cake.
It's pretty simple for me and difficult for you.
I don't give a shit if somebody has a handshake or not. However, if they post garbage and also happen to be a handshake, I refer to them as "handshake."
And I didn't even downvote handshake or you in case you aren't shills and just retarded.
I don't care about upvotes, you big dummy.
If you want to point to Q Drops based on the time difference between the Obama Tweet and the @Fortbenning Tweet and treat it as a Delta, you absolutely need to show the link. Otherwise, your decode is complete garbage. But you knew that and you probably get paid per reply (or you're just really that retarded)...
Pretty sure that link was "i spy"
lol
WHAT?
Obama Tweeted "I Spy" back in 2013, and the Tweet was referenced in a Q Drop.
The same day Obama's records are subject to FOIA, @FortBenning Tweets "I spy."
This is an easy decode that has nothing to do with imaginary deltas.
Which delta was imaginary? And who are you even talking to?
"
BO Tweet- Feb 15, 2013
US Army Tweet- Jan 20, 2022
Difference= 3261 days
Q#3261 Mar 28, 2019 3:47:28 PM EDT
https://twitter.com/barch_anne/status/1111353382323785728
Front row seat, VIP Patriot!
Enjoy the show.
Q
Mirror of 3261= 1623
Q#1623 Jun 28, 2018 2:25:13 PM EDT
Trying to ‘normalize’.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/06/28/netflix-under-fire-for-film-critics-say-contains-child-pornography.html
Who just joined the Board of Netflix?
Who pushed?
What is coming?
Q "
Susan Rice was a mirrored drop number. Not directly as this doesn't talk about her but she was working for netflix while this was going on, after having left the WH. Again, I SPY dose not have to have anything to do with Susan rice for it to lead to information relevant to her, and information relevant to what is going on.
What are you really on about?
You seem kind of butt-hurt that NCSWIC, I apologize as I shouldn't talk like that but WHAT GIVES!?
You keep saying that the information isn't relevant but ALL of it IS! Just be glad you got the cliff notes before it went main stream because all of this isn't going to be easy for many to swallow.
You mad because they used days between the I SPY tweets to look for information? If Obama's info is coming out and he had been a part of what netflix was doing while susan was working for them then what difference dose it make how anyone found the information, which was freely provided. DAMN!
EVEN SHOWED THEIR DAMN WORK!!!! COME ON!
@mnpsna is a God send! I couldn't have done it more clean myself. Kind of makes me feel inadequate so thanks for that I guess. lol+
wasn't the SR link # a MIRROR of another drop that was linked? I feel like handshake is probably an insider as I haven't seen many operate like them and they are spot on.
Your first comment to them was something like nice try handshake. COME ON!!!
If he had been way off the rails like some of these people that claim to see their name in the comms or something I could sympathize with you, but honestly you just seem hell bent on debunking decent digging. Because you cannot fathom the link doesn't mean that there isn't one. Nothing that handshake has posted would serve against Q and yet they are being attacked which started with comments about them being a handshake account.
Could it be as simple as both are about to hit mainstream and neither are really the same issue as the other?
Promises made, promises kept is all I see.
My issue is how easily they got everyone to play into the social credit system. As if it hadn't already been implemented years ago. Vested authority isn't new and that is essentially the pinnacle of social credit.
No.
Well, I suppose that settles everything. Everything you said is correct and no one else has offered any valuable information. Good day!