Because of the Strauss–Howe generational theory, it is stated that a major war occurs once every 80 years that changes the direction of the country. So far, these wars were:
The American Revolutionary War (1780s)
Civil War (1860s)
World War II (1940s)
????? (2020s)
As you can see, we are due for another war and the recent turmoil is suggestive of one on the way. But what would such a war look like? If one looks at what has been happening domestically and abroad, one would struggle in predicting if the next war will be a revolutionary war, a civil war, or a global war. After thinking about this question for months, I'm no longer convinced that any of the three options will be what the war is about. We need to look at what these previous wars prevented from ever occurring again to understand the war they went through.
The American Revolutionary War was to prevent living under a tyrannical monarchy, so the US fought a revolution to create their own nation. The Civil War was to prevent slavery and break away states from ever occurring again, so the US fought their own states to restore the Union. The Second World War was to prevent another scramble for power across the global theater, so the US fought to become a global superpower, developed the nuclear bomb, and established the United Nations. So what would the US fight to prevent from ever occurring again in the war of the 2020s? The answer to that question is... elite, criminal corruption. We all know that many global institutions, including those in the US, have been hijacked by elite, marxist, and criminal actors who are attempting to, in sly fashion, undermine freedom so they can become rulers of a New World Order. They, however, have been more expose now when compared to two years ago. We all know that Trump is still the president of the United States and is the enemy of the Cabal. So how will this war spark?
I predict that the War on Corruption, or whatever name historians will give it, will officially begin soon after Trump regains power. Likely, he will initiate the war to round-up every elite, criminal actor and try them in what would become the largest corruption trial in human history. There would be more to simply rounding people up, some states, such as China, are in bed with the Cabal and would have to be properly dismantled. Some states will not be very participative in giving up their criminal elite and would have to be coerced by the weight of the US military to get those bad actors involved. As you may have noticed, this would be a global conflict, but would be fundamentally different from the World Wars in the sense that the War on Corruption is primarily about fighting a subset of bad elite actors and not nation states. It would have more in similarity with the War on Terror than WW2. I also do imagine that the US will have allies in this war and would likely gain allies as the war progresses.
So after the war is done, what will have to occur to ensure that such a travesty of elite corruption never occurs again? I would imagine that the US will amend the constitution to give more powers to the states. Perhaps, more investigative power into corruption will be granted to the states. I also imagine that global institutions will be established to encourage moving the world into a populist world order compared to the world order of elites from generations past. With the internet, I don't imagine that an elite Cabal will ever become common place ever again. We just might be residing on a new age of populism.
Fair Winds
Guy_Cross
Maybe, maybe not. This is the only war that may have been legit, but I'm really not sure about that at all. This may have been a freemason faction war. It also may have been the first step in a Globalist Communist Government. I say that because of how things turned out, i.e. our "Union" was just too much like the eventual European Union to be coincidence; though the cause and effect there is not clear.
The Civil War was to create slavery for all of us. You got the second part right, but that was to centralize power to make America easier to control. The Civil War killed the entire Constitution and the whole purpose of the United States. The idea of a union of independent states "for the common defense and ease of trade" became nothing more than a farce after that event.
The Second World War was to create The Machine. It was to create the US as a global superpower, because the Cabal was already completely entrenched there, and they had completely solidified The Matrix by that time. The US as a superpower was the perfect machine to create The Machine.
The US (We The People) didn't create the United Nations, the PTB (Rockefellers, Vanderbilts, DuPonts, Bushs, etc.) did. The UN is a true one world government. All other governments are subjects of the UN. The UN is the governing body of The Machine.
Your understanding of causality is backwards. Everything was created by them for this purpose. They have not "infiltrated" anything.
The war started in earnest about five years ago. We have already won it. We just haven't figured that out yet. After this event, there will be no more wars. The "War Cycle" as you suggest has been one of their design (the PTB). With the possible exception of the first, every single other war (not just the ones you mentioned) was started by them. They were necessary steps in the consolidation of power, and the construction of the Machine.
This has been going on longer than you know, and their control has been much larger than you are imagining.
Yeah Slyver's interpretation of history is is much more likely than OP.
OP seems to have been taught a simplistic idea of why wars exist.
Really a lot of people on GAW dont really understand war very well. Its very unfair, its very annoying, its very slow, and we are barely given any information. So we have to extrapolate from human nature and our current power structures & events what must be the actual things occuring.
All the names you mention have a single owner, Payseur family.
Maybe. I have not seen good evidence to support that statement, though I can't deny the possibility either. If you have good evidence (preferably primary sources) that supports this statement, please let me know.