For the "Cop Hater" fan bois...
Educate yourselves!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
It certainly does. Qualified immunity applies to ALL GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC OFFICIALS. Not just law enforcement. It applies to judges, Clerk of Court secretaries, federal, state, county, and city attorneys and their staff, city garbage collectors, city and county fire, building and other inspectors, ANYBODY who works for a governmental entity. Are they all not citizens? Do you even think?
Which clearly shows why you would never have ever been considered for a position on the Supreme Court. You simply don't get to place law enforcement officers in a "Damned if you do AND damned if you don't." situation. And it's not more protection, it's sufficiently minimum appropriate protection.
AGAIN: “A policeman’s lot is not so unhappy that he must choose between being charged with dereliction of duty if he does not arrest when he has probable cause, and being mulcted in damages if he does,” ~ Chief Justice Earl Warren
I'll reword the question: why are normal citizens not holding a seat under government not allowed the same luxury? If you cannot see how having a set of citizens with more freedoms than another is a problem I do not know if you are aware of what the United States actually is. This does not fly in a republic which is why I suggested the changes that I did and why I am as adamant as I am. The operation is illegal at large. The fact that it exists as it does today is testimony that they do not do as they are said to do. Government officials shouldn't be allowed a position that they can make mistakes without due burden but the average citizen cannot. That is kind of like a monarchy.
Doesn't matter though. It is being rectified.
I will leave you with this again.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
My freedoms and rights as a citizen are clearly laid out. All the fancy wording in the world cannot hide them. Obligations levied against my Freedoms and Rights are unconstitutional, tyrannical if you would. Treason.
Just because it started long ago doesn't give anyone a pass that is partaking today.
No, you're not simply rewording the question, you're "MOVING THE GOAL POSTS" since your original argument failed on account of your ignorance. We all can see that very easily. By the way, that's #5 on the ole;
Liberal Left Wing(nut) Arguing Checklist.
Let's see which liberal argument tactic he uses next, shall we?
You have shown me that already.
All that was added to the question was not holding a seat under government. I did that for clarity as you continue to fail to answer why Citizens, not PUBLIC SERVANTS (whom are citizens, I hope, LOTS of dual citizenship going on in congress (also illegal AF) not granted the same. That is inequality, by definition. Supporting one class over another.
I am not arguing with you, I am telling you. It is OVER! Those in uniform have a decision to make. Get right.