It Was All There in the EUA. Why Couldn’t They See it?
(redwave.press)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
That is a five star article that agrees with something I have been experiencing but did not know how to define.
Summary: We have moved from a past situation where an oral form of communication was predominant to one where a written form of communicatino was most predominant. In the most recent generation(s) we have moved or are moving back to an oral form of communication being predominant.
Persuasive Oral Arguments are considered as having higher value that well reasoned written arguments. An argument presented by an acknowledged respected (by that person) authority will be accepted without question, yet the same argument presented in written form will be ignored as it did not come from an accepted source or perhaps because it did not come in an accepted form (oral preferred over written).
Compelling observation, nicely stated...
Read Neil Postman. He writes about how the loss of the printing press as the dominant technology, and the switch to TV and now internet, would have many disastrous effects. Idk if he wrote about the TV turning us back to an oral society rather than written word. But the connection makes sense to me.
I would prefer to read as I am more of a visual learner than an audio one. Found this when I started college for the first time at age 36.
I saw some reviews of his book, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, on Goodreads. One by Rickeclectic was particularly interesting. In case anyone wants to take a look at the book and reviews: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/74034.Amusing_Ourselves_to_Death
To me having an oral society is natural. I read a lot, but certain things are well-communicated orally. The problem is liars and programmers have an easier time hypnotizing people with the television.
His analysis on why the printing press was so superior to all other dominant technologies is very convincing. I went on a roll and read like 7 of his books a few years back. Amusing ourselves to death is GREAT. Highly recommended.
Yes, another words, we as a society have lost or are losing our critical thinking skills, don't believe in our abilities to do so, so we will believe some moron who calls himself or herself an expert. Which, to me brings us back to 45 putting Fauci center stage during all this in the first place; because, you can't tell them you have to show them.
Yes, in other words,
Maybe you dictated that comment, but that was weird to read.
And here we all are. Notice how many posts are presenting a video. Followed by arguments over which video pundits are reliable, which digital platforms are worthy, and a few scattered pleas for a print source rather than a time-consuming, ephemeral video.
Do you have a source for that?
If you mean, does my post have a source then the source is the article referenced in the initial post. If this was intended for humor then HAHA.
It was humor lol. The article is excellent.