I passed a car on the road last week with a bumper sticker that made me chuckle. It read: “Critical thinking — the other national deficit.” I’ve been thinking about that bumper sticker a lot lately — ever since my essay “What is Luciferase” (exclusively on Substack) set off a firestorm. The corporate media issued the same blanket denial with the same regurgitated sentences (a cut and paste journalism job if ever there was one!) seemingly around the world: there’s no such ingredient secretly hiding inside the experimental vaccines!
Did any of these so-called journalists do the homework? Did any of them actually perform a fact-check? Of course they didn’t. Most of them didn’t even read the essay. (Let’s be honest: most of them don’t read anything at all.) I had left the instructions for fact-checking my claim right there for everyone to see:
-
Go to the MODERNA website.
-
Click: the PATENTS page.
-
Click: PATENT US 10,703,789
-
Do a keyword search for: Luciferase.
This was too difficult a task for our dishonest horde of corporate journalists. At least one brave soul bothered to do it — and that honest man happened to be a Google software engineer named Zach Vorhies.
Let me repeat: Luciferase is INCLUDED in the mRNA sequence of the Moderna patent! So I’m right — and the corporate media is wrong. Does this surprise anybody?
The corporate press has already admitted that Luciferase was used in the testing phase of the vaccines as well. So it’s listed in the mRNA sequence of the Moderna patent AND it’s used in the testing of the vaccines but I’m a conspiracy theorist?
One more thing: the new COVID-19 antibody test is called SATiN and it uses Luciferase. No, I’m not kidding. Just click here to see for yourself.
Let me repeat that information: the antibody test is called SATiN.
I don’t know about you, but I’m not getting anywhere near this dark stuff. Just listen to how the SATiN test works:
“We basically incubate those three little molecular biological pieces with a prick of blood,” Stagljar says. “And if there are antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the blood, these antibodies will ‘glue’ the three parts of luciferase into a functional molecule that will start shining.”
In other words, you need to have COVID-19 antibodies present to make the enzyme glow. When the glow occurs, the researchers can then measure the amount of light emitted with an instrument called a luminometer. The more antibodies a person has, the brighter the luciferase will shine. There’s something very wrong here. You know it and I know it. You don’t have to be a Christian to understand: names matter. It’s not an accident that they’ve given this name to this test. It’s a warning.
He who has ears, let him hear.
https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/luciferase-was-bad-but-it-gets-worse
The only people who worry about IQ numbers are the people who struggle to demonstrate their intelligence through any other means. You're better than that.
I can absolutely "create hypotheticals." That's not the issue.
The issue is that I don't simply accept the hypotheticals because they exist. I don't allow myself to create nonfalsifiable theories about the world and how it works.
I don't reject literally every explanation for every event in the world that ISN'T considered hypothetical.
There is a difference between having a theory that ISN'T proven wrong and having a theory that CAN'T be proven wrong. Your theory on the world is in the latter.
Maybe you are right. Maybe the entire world is lying except you. Maybe I can't even trust a "communist microscope", whatever that is. Maybe I can't trust any information that would make you appear to be wrong about things.
But you know what I can't do from that position? I can't make a single prediction. I can only claim credit in the aftermath, when eventually something MIGHT look kind of like it came true, as long as I do some letter substitutions.
"Think mirror." "Disinfo is necessary." "Ammo expended."
Entertain a hypothetical for me. Can you think of any OTHER reason why an anonymous prophet on the internet would suggest that anything that disproves his theory is just because of disinfo, or to expend ammo, or because it's some 5D countermove?
Can you entertain any hypothetical reason why someone would tell his followers that anything appearing to be failure is actually evidence that the prophecy is coming true? Why loss is just a tactical repositioning? Why any big flop must have been just a distraction for the Deep State?
You can't be proven wrong in any empirical way because of your beliefs.
And maybe you're right.
But if you aren't, then you're stuck in a theory that you literally can't prove your way out of. Because it's nonfalsifiable. And you will be stuck there until YOU can start entertaining hypotheticals.
So I guess for that sake, I hope you're right. Because if you aren't, you have left yourself absolutely no way to see it.
I didn't have breakfast today.