This poses an interesting sociological question. For those here that are single, what are your thoughts on intercourse with a mudblood? Do you think they could transmit something harmful to you? Could you get VAIDS by having sex with them? Won’t mudbloods just start lying and saying they’re not injected in order to have sex with a pureblood?
It seems like a tremendous opportunity to create a pureblood verification service, sort of like an STD test but proving one didn’t get injected.
No, I investigated every article you posted, in fact.
What I found was nothing to support the assertion that women are worried about being rejected for being vaccinated.
The first four articles you posted do indeed talk about the importance of vaccine status in dating, but only the importance to vaccinated people. They said vaccinated people really need their dates to also be vaccinated. Most of the surveyed demographics were vaccinated and none of the articles said that unvaccinated people were also concerned about their partner’s vaccine status.
The fifth article doesn’t really talk about anything relevant to this conversation.
The sixth article does indeed talk about a woman being rejected by a date due to her being vaccinated, but it was not at all discussing any regret or apprehension. It was kind of a pity piece expressing shock over how people can believe that vaccinated sexual fluids could be dangerous in any abnormal capacity.
The entire point of research is to do the mental legwork so you can share your results and save other people the time. I read all your links and evaluated the evidence.
Was there something I missed in your evidence that supports the notion that women are apprehensive about admitting they’re vaccinated for fear of being rejected by unvaccinated men? Your articles seem to support the opposite: that vaccinated people in general are rejecting unvaccinated people and are proudly sharing their vaccine status.
Lets summarize. It seems like you agree that people believe that vaccination status is important when dating, up there with other attributes that people find significant like age, height, weight, wealth, profession, where someone lives, and probably many other factors. Right? Based on the results I gave you.
Would you also agree that dating is not an entirely 100% honest interaction, and that all parties being non-perfect beings prefer to paper over their flaws, and promote their best side? That's a motivation to not be entirely honest about all these associated properties listed above. Among which, is vaxx status, as we already agreed.
Maybe you are an incredibly flawless specimen, lets say.. and find it hard to relate to this notion. In this state of perfection you have attained, this amazing IQ you have has surely made the connection that all other people are lacking in this quality. So thats how other people will be, and can be a predictor as to their reactions and motivations.
So now we have agreed that vaxx status is something that people are motivated to lie about. Next up, do you think its something only women lie about, or that perhaps both genders do?
Having needed to carry you to this point, I dont think you comprehend the concepts that have led up to here.. but thats ok. I hope this helps you.
Agreeing that people are talking about an issue does not mean agreeing that there is evidence of significant support for one side.
I agree lots of people have strong feelings on evolution. I do not agree that therefore, it must be true that most scientists disagree with evolution.
You suggested that women feel uncomfortable admitting they are vaccinated to single men for fear of rejection. Every source you provide then only supports the notion that vaccinated people are nervous about dating unvaccinated people.
I don’t really know what else I have to say here. We can agree that a topic is being discussed in the media, and if you think that’s good enough to assume that your point as been proven, then there really isn’t anywhere else to go from there.