drip...drip.... not that this isn't bad, but won't push the needle on the normies.
waiting for disclosure they spied on his private text messages, phone calls, and emails -- as well as those close to him. because that disclosure exposes coordinated actions of the IC, DNC, HRC, Defense Contractors, Media [assets], and Congress whose "lack of oversight" was not a mistake.
You are correct; they would have needed inside help, and they got it. Durham’s story is not finished; it's only just beginning.
Obama's campaign paid that law firm (Perkins Coi) $800,000+ in 2016. If Hillary is the “icing on the cake” when this is all over, Obama will be the sprinkles, the sparklers, and the cherry on top.
drip...drip.... not that this isn't bad, but won't push the needle on the normies.
waiting for disclosure they spied on his private text messages, phone calls, and emails -- as well as those close to him. because that disclosure exposes coordinated actions of the IC, DNC, HRC, Defense Contractors, Media [assets], and Congress whose "lack of oversight" was not a mistake.
...you don't believe this proves that fact more decidedly...
...wouldn't it take more "inside" help to tap into the White House communications than it would private communications?
...also wouldn't breaching White House communications incur national security issues?
This is enough. Straight illegal. They were mining his IP traffic which gathers everything.
Maybe it was a trap....hehe
...they weren't as smart as Putin, and they took the "bait"...
good points.
You are correct; they would have needed inside help, and they got it. Durham’s story is not finished; it's only just beginning.
Obama's campaign paid that law firm (Perkins Coi) $800,000+ in 2016. If Hillary is the “icing on the cake” when this is all over, Obama will be the sprinkles, the sparklers, and the cherry on top.
...howls...
...I like the way that you decorate a cake....