5
GreenEyesOfTexas 5 points ago +5 / -0

In his campaign speeches Trump is now emphasizing that he will not allow any vaccines to be mandated. That is a contradiction to being hardcore pro-vax, and definitely not what Big Pharma wants to hear.

I agree— there’s a lot going on that we don’t know yet.

Good post, OP.

2
GreenEyesOfTexas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it just me… or was that the weakest, less than half-ass endorsement ever made??

He only spent a few seconds on Trump, half of which was talking about his disagreements with him and said the people wanted to give Trump another shot. All the rest of the speech was about him.

1
GreenEyesOfTexas 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is suspiciously close to the date of his upcoming deposition (the 13th...I think).

Could it be a ploy by the DOJ to rescue him from answering most of the questions, or being deposed at all?

1
GreenEyesOfTexas 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're very welcome.

And speaking of the "evil" judge, this is Robert Gouveia's update on part of that case today:

"Expert Says Mar-a-Lago MASSIVELY UNDERVALUED (but Engoron Doesn't Care)"

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4-czWTTNfU]

4
GreenEyesOfTexas 4 points ago +4 / -0

President Trump has had a few wins, as well as a few setbacks, but other than NY, these big cases aren't even close to the trials.

There have been solid examples of bias by the judges and the District Attorneys, but they don't seem to care. I'm not an attorney; however, it seems the majority of legal opinions indicate the bias would certainly be grounds for President Trump to win on appeal.

The moron judge in NY has already decided he was guilty before the trial (no jury) so that's how it will probably end.... and then it will likely get overturned.

On the GA case, Jim Jordan (Judiciary Committee) is on Fani's fanny about colluding with the J6 committee, which is only one of her many issues.

The judge in Florida overruled Jack Smith who wanted to seal some documents and not turn over to Trump's attorneys. Those should be juicy...

One big setback was a court deciding Trump has no presidential immunity against J6 lawsuits, so there will likely be a barrage of people suing him for their emotional distress--blah, blah, blah. On the other hand, more J6 videos are now being released, plus additional people are coming forward with proof it was all a setup. The J6 public opinion tide is turning (in Trump's favor).

Speaking of J6, the "Select Committee" destroyed videotapes of depositions and other documents, which is the destruction of government records... and makes them look even more sleazy. I think that is also illegal, but they're Democrats so they have nothing to fear...

So far, President Trump has won in all of the states that were trying to keep him off the state ballots based on the 14th Amendment. Maybe this will take the wind out of the sails of most of the remaining states that hoped this was going to be the solution to take out Trump.

Several attorneys provide overviews of Trump's cases almost daily on YouTube, Rumble, and/or other places. Robert Gouveia (YT), Scott Goulet (YT), Robert Barnes (Rumble - VivaBarnes). I'm sure others do the same, but I don't visit many social media sites, so I'm stating 3 that I do follow.

Also, Julie Kelly is an investigative reporter who gives a lot of updates on Twitter. I'm not sure if she's an attorney, but she attends many court hearings and has a lot of good info on the J6 trials (and videotapes).

Hope this helps (from a non-attorney perspective). 😉

5
GreenEyesOfTexas 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I recall correctly, Obama told President Trump that the two greatest threats to the country were China and Michael Flynn.

That, along with Flynn begin prosecuted on a bogus charge, doesn't compute with him playing on their team.

Trump will return to office; Flynn has previously said he will talk when the time is right; and alarm bells are going off.

Over the target...

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a PAC formed by a group of RINOS; most notably, one of the founders was Kelly-Anne Conway's ex-hubby, George.

The purpose of the PAC was to preserve "democracy" (along with whatever else they needed to say to raise money); however, they seem to have only one target--Trump. Not surprising, the media loved the Lincoln Project, at least in their early years, and gave them plenty of press.

They came under fire for raising a ton of money but funneling most of it to companies owned by some of the founders. They also got attacked for big fundraising campaigns to defeat Trump supporters in various elections... but failing miserably.

There was a scandal involving one of their guys (a founder, I think) being accused of sexual harassment of numerous young men and teenagers.

Other than George, Rick Wilson was the most visible. Both of them are eat up with TDS, and their obsession has always been to bring him down. Big talkers-- sort of like Biden going after CornPop; or challenging someone to a fight... or pushups. And, also like Biden, they're losers full of hot air.

That's all I remember off the top of my brain... and they're not important enough to keep up with.

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Along that topic, this is an interview with Judge Joe Brown:

Judge Joe Brown With An Interesting Story About Donald Trump

Joe Brown is asked if he believes Trump is a racist. After his initial response to the question, he just keeps on talking and throws in a few more tidbits I had never heard before.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rkmd5v7I5I

(Btw, this YouTube guy, Doc Rich, is a big Trump supporter. He has over a million subscribers; I suspect he has enlightened quite a few.)

10
GreenEyesOfTexas 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm not an attorney either but considering the Trump rulings from mostly biased judges, this does seem to be a good decision... at least in regards to these judges.

If this ruling is such a "big deal" hopefully any potential new judges will be inclined to recuse themselves if they are biased.

12
GreenEyesOfTexas 12 points ago +12 / -0

Based on their comments, I think it is good news; but, I'm not an attorney. Maybe some of our attorney frens will weigh in.

The news had just dropped and the ACLJ guys did that short video just to make the announcement. I assume they will do a video with an in-depth discussion later today. If it's as big of a deal as they implied, I'm sure there will be a lot of coverage by others as well.

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for all that you do!! You already had your own folder in my Saved documents. I’ve now made a second one: “UNLEASHED Ashland Dog”

(...except, it had to be AshlandDog as one word because there are so few spaces allowed for folder headings... 😩😪😭)

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

“... the Dollar General version...”. What a great description! 😂🤣😂

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pedophiles cannot be rehabilitated and should never have access to kids. This can only be guaranteed by execution or mandatory life in prison.

If there's any potential of being released from prison, I don't think castration is a good idea, as this could result in an escalation of aggression and violence.

Not all pedophiles murder kids; however, the majority of kid murderers, with the exception of deranged parents, are pedophiles.

IMO, execution is the best remedy; second best is life in prison. Unfortunately, I don't see either happening. Biden's new SCOTUS pick, Ketanji Brown Jackson, is a big 'ole softy for pedophiles. In fact, I suspect many liberal judges are the same.

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

The House can pass a charge of Impeachment; however, the Senate would have to approve (with 2/3 vote, I think).

Currently, the only benefit to any House impeachments would be the information and evidence, from a Senate trial, finally being disclosed to the public.

Beyond that, there will be no official impeachments from this Senate.

6
GreenEyesOfTexas 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, it appears suspicious; I suspect it was all carefully staged and scripted.

It's not only too late for raids, but it's also irrelevant. There is no way in hell he would not have been tipped off by this DOJ.

Biden's houses, offices, storage facilities, backyard storage buildings, and dog houses, are all clean as a whistle... the same for Hunter and other family members, and probably Obama as well.

9
GreenEyesOfTexas 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yet our historical monuments and statues, throughout this country, are defaced, destroyed, or removed.

2
GreenEyesOfTexas 2 points ago +2 / -0

I met this doctor in the early 90's. I wouldn't understand the medical comments you mentioned, but with the advancement of science and research since he first started, it's quite possible his treatments would have changed over the years. He was definitely a fighter for a cause, and a direction, that few others would touch.

The powerful tried to destroy him from the beginning; insurance companies wouldn't for his treatments; and unfortunately, there was no social media to at least saturate the public enough to question traditional cancer treatments.

Plus, keep in mind, he was located in Texas--in the same area as the world-renowned, M.D. Anderson Cancer Hospital system...

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

I met this doctor many years ago when a relative with cancer wanted to see if he could help. Most of his patients were those who had already gone the conventional routes and there was nothing left to try; and of course, no insurance would pay for his services.

That was the early 90's and the powerful were trying to destroy him. Had he not been stifled it makes you wonder... not only of the progress against cancer, but also an awareness/skepticism about the medical community may have prevented the COVID/Vaxx schemes from taking root so easily.

view more: Next ›