So if Remington is responsible and the gun killed people but not the person using it, does this set precedent for other people to sue random companies. For example a person driving drunk in a Chevy hits another car and kills 3 people. Those people's families can sue GM because their vehicle killed people? Of course that's absurd and we all know people wield all kinds of objects that cause death but it's never been the objects fault until now.
And yes, I know, sandy hoax was a false flag that failed to Garner support for more anti 2A legislation.
So if Remington is responsible and the gun killed people but not the person using it, does this set precedent for other people to sue random companies. For example a person driving drunk in a Chevy hits another car and kills 3 people. Those people's families can sue GM because their vehicle killed people? Of course that's absurd and we all know people wield all kinds of objects that cause death but it's never been the objects fault until now.
And yes, I know, sandy hoax was a false flag that failed to Garner support for more anti 2A legislation.