If you don’t believe in Durham you don’t believe in Q, and quite frankly, I don’t know why you’d be here. Durham is how we win. His investigation beings with the Russia hoax and likely goes all the way to the 2020 election hoax and Jan 6. At this point one thing is clear, HE HAS IT ALL!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
My theory isnt that they are the same, but they work together and have shared interests, each delivering on a piece that the other depends on, and vice versa.
Without Q, the findings of Durham would never have been plausible, believed or accepted. Ergo, an out-of-channel comms strategy had to be employed to 'prime the pump'. Hence, we have Q.
Without Durham, there never would have been any work-within-the-system means of addressing all the horrors that Q shed light upon. Which leaves only the most risky outlier options to address the crimes, think storming of the bastille but world wide and against tens of thousands of the very worst people. Not impossible to arrange, but so improbable that it may well be. Hence, we have Durham.