Please don’t dismiss what Reiner Fuellmich is doing. He knows the law inside out. He’s been bringing in some incredible people to give there statements and this morning I found this:
I posted it on a post about Prince Andrew. But these are the words I found interesting:
This is because Chesshyre’s case did not result in a criminal conviction. Rather, the inquiry heard “he was found to have committed the acts in question” in a trial of the facts.
An English system court did not give a man a trial, it instead conducted a trial of facts and based on the evidence conclude guilt.
That was 2017 not some archaic Middle Ages law.
Fuellmich is using the same rules that the Judicial system uses.
Please don’t dismiss what Reiner Fuellmich is doing. He knows the law inside out. He’s been bringing in some incredible people to give there statements and this morning I found this:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/mar/30/sex-offender-retains-queen-honour-reform
I posted it on a post about Prince Andrew. But these are the words I found interesting:
This is because Chesshyre’s case did not result in a criminal conviction. Rather, the inquiry heard “he was found to have committed the acts in question” in a trial of the facts.
An English system court did not give a man a trial, it instead conducted a trial of facts and based on the evidence conclude guilt.
That was 2017 not some archaic Middle Ages law.
Fuellmich is using the same rules that the Judicial system uses.