Q's words are not proof of anything. They're mostly vague prophecies written by an anonymous chan user. I know you have constructed connections between these posts and world events, but that has always been after the fact (future proves past).
You've never said, "I predict this major, obvious thing will happen publicly on this day because of Q post#" and then that prediction came true. You've merely insisted that certain events that are currently occurring or have occurred are proved by interpreting certain Q posts the way you believe.
Proof means I can apply this logic and make predictions about the future. I haven't been able to do that with Q posts.
Can you make a specific prediction for a specific timeframe, right now, based on a Q post? Are you willing to see if your interpretation of Q is actually scientific and can make testable predictions about the future?
We can try it. Show me a Q post right now, and tell me what that Q post says will happen, and when. I will set a reminder on my clock.
If you can't do that, then you have the answer to your question.
You are never willing to actually test your beliefs in a way that could fail. I ask you to demonstrate the truthfulness of your interpretation of Q and Q's legitimacy by having you help me make a prediction based on Q, and you deflect. Again.
This should be alarming to you. I am always willing to put my belief to the test.
I predict right now, officially, that Donald Trump will not return as President through any other mechanism than a regular four-year election in the year 2024, 2028, or perhaps a later, depending on his health. I predict that Q's Plan will not have occurred by November 3rd, 2024.
That is a testable and falsifiable premise. We can now wait to see if I am right. I am willing to modify my hypothesis as we go, but based on what I know now, that's my prediction. And I will either be correct, or I will be incorrect. This is falsifiable.
You won't do the same thing. And as I said, this should be alarming to you.
Anyway, I'm fairly certain this thread has been removed anyway. I'm always happy to talk with you in other avenues.
Q's words are not proof of anything. They're mostly vague prophecies written by an anonymous chan user. I know you have constructed connections between these posts and world events, but that has always been after the fact (future proves past).
You've never said, "I predict this major, obvious thing will happen publicly on this day because of Q post#" and then that prediction came true. You've merely insisted that certain events that are currently occurring or have occurred are proved by interpreting certain Q posts the way you believe.
Proof means I can apply this logic and make predictions about the future. I haven't been able to do that with Q posts.
Can you make a specific prediction for a specific timeframe, right now, based on a Q post? Are you willing to see if your interpretation of Q is actually scientific and can make testable predictions about the future?
We can try it. Show me a Q post right now, and tell me what that Q post says will happen, and when. I will set a reminder on my clock.
If you can't do that, then you have the answer to your question.
You are never willing to actually test your beliefs in a way that could fail. I ask you to demonstrate the truthfulness of your interpretation of Q and Q's legitimacy by having you help me make a prediction based on Q, and you deflect. Again.
This should be alarming to you. I am always willing to put my belief to the test.
I predict right now, officially, that Donald Trump will not return as President through any other mechanism than a regular four-year election in the year 2024, 2028, or perhaps a later, depending on his health. I predict that Q's Plan will not have occurred by November 3rd, 2024.
That is a testable and falsifiable premise. We can now wait to see if I am right. I am willing to modify my hypothesis as we go, but based on what I know now, that's my prediction. And I will either be correct, or I will be incorrect. This is falsifiable.
You won't do the same thing. And as I said, this should be alarming to you.
Anyway, I'm fairly certain this thread has been removed anyway. I'm always happy to talk with you in other avenues.