No one gave a shit when they ran the article last Jan. No one will give a shit now. The thing is the idea and ideas of and from Q filtered through us and we converted information to intelligence and disseminated it in non-Q communication channels. We still do this to this day. The Q (“Qanon”) movement isn’t growing per se in big numbers. But our ideas are, just w/o the Q brand attached to it.
Year old regurgitation. They are out of ammo.
https://www.enca.com/life/swiss-text-sleuths-unpick-mystery-qanon-origins
You'd think they'd be more creative.
No one gave a shit when they ran the article last Jan. No one will give a shit now. The thing is the idea and ideas of and from Q filtered through us and we converted information to intelligence and disseminated it in non-Q communication channels. We still do this to this day. The Q (“Qanon”) movement isn’t growing per se in big numbers. But our ideas are, just w/o the Q brand attached to it.
Not the same article but more of the same attack tactics.
It’s not the same article but it’s the same players and story just reworded.
I stand corrected. After rereading all three articles you are correct.
And here it is again:
https://dnyuz.com/2022/02/19/who-is-behind-qanon-linguistic-detectives-find-fingerprints/
Pretty wild, huh?
The NYT piece is about a South African named Furber. The article that matches your old article is this one today at Yahoo:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/qanon-machine-learning-205618665.html