Predicting that a human trafficking sting is going to occur during the Superbowl in one of the country's largest cities when it happens every year in many large cities (and is easily researchable) isn't exactly demonstrating the prowess you're hoping it would.
Ha, no, that was not a prediction. That was an after-the-fact connection you made.
The 500 was in reference to your “proof” that DHS was interfering. You never made the assertion the number was about victims yourself until the sting had already happened.
If only 500 avocados fell off a truck on the freeway. Or if you had specifically said, “this 500 number is going to represent victims.”
Only finding those connections after the fact is how confirmation bias works. Being unable to specifically predict events and only explain then in hindsight usually means what you’re dealing with isn’t scientific.
You predicted that a human trafficking sting would happen in LA around the Super Bowl?
2022 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/nearly-500-people-arrested-california-human-trafficking-sting-operation/
2021 https://www.wfla.com/news/hillsborough-county/dozens-arrested-in-super-bowl-human-trafficking-sting-sheriff-says/
2016 https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2615991-superbowl-50-human-trafficking-sting-unveils-dozens-ofvictims-and-suspects
Yeah, the Superbowl is a major time for human traffickers to get work done, and they do stings all over the country every year over Superbowl weekend.
Atlanta, 2019 https://www.11alive.com/article/sports/nfl/superbowl/fbi-over-100-arrested-in-metro-atlanta-super-bowl-child-sex-trafficking-sting-several-children-recovered/85-949c965c-9fb2-4b03-9714-0690aaa53774
Multiple others: https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28607449/the-super-bowl-remains-target-human-trafficking
Predicting that a human trafficking sting is going to occur during the Superbowl in one of the country's largest cities when it happens every year in many large cities (and is easily researchable) isn't exactly demonstrating the prowess you're hoping it would.
Ha, no, that was not a prediction. That was an after-the-fact connection you made.
The 500 was in reference to your “proof” that DHS was interfering. You never made the assertion the number was about victims yourself until the sting had already happened.
If only 500 avocados fell off a truck on the freeway. Or if you had specifically said, “this 500 number is going to represent victims.”
Only finding those connections after the fact is how confirmation bias works. Being unable to specifically predict events and only explain then in hindsight usually means what you’re dealing with isn’t scientific.
I am an anon who appreciates his anonymity and prefers to let his words speak for himself rather than show off the size of my credentials. :)
I love this anon 😆