Or perhaps I think you are simply wrong about some things, but don't think that by definition can justify calling you stupid, and I am uninterested in stupid people.
Your theories are complex and interesting. I agree that there are some bad people at high levels of power and probably even organization between them, such as with Epstein. I might even be convinced of a Cabal.
But I think you're wrong about your faith in Q, and wrong about your interpretation of Trump's behavior.
The fact that I think you and I see the world so differently doesn't mean I think one of us is an idiot. I can think you're wrong and still find your theories interesting enough to discuss.
It's... intellectually weird to only talk to people who agree with you.
No. I don't think life is easy enough to assume that all mainstream knowledge is a lie, and that all censored things must be the truth. I think plenty of people tell truths and lies and things in between, and how people react to it may be justified or not.
It's cognitively lazy to assume you can create some sort of schema for determining the truth with as few criteria as, "Is this censored?" or "Was this said on CNN?". It's just as brainwashed to reject everything you hear on the MSM as it is to accept it.
You care far more about what Reddit is saying about things than I ever have.
Incorrect. I don't waste my time with people I believe are stupid.
Or perhaps I think you are simply wrong about some things, but don't think that by definition can justify calling you stupid, and I am uninterested in stupid people.
Your theories are complex and interesting. I agree that there are some bad people at high levels of power and probably even organization between them, such as with Epstein. I might even be convinced of a Cabal.
But I think you're wrong about your faith in Q, and wrong about your interpretation of Trump's behavior.
The fact that I think you and I see the world so differently doesn't mean I think one of us is an idiot. I can think you're wrong and still find your theories interesting enough to discuss.
It's... intellectually weird to only talk to people who agree with you.
No. I don't think life is easy enough to assume that all mainstream knowledge is a lie, and that all censored things must be the truth. I think plenty of people tell truths and lies and things in between, and how people react to it may be justified or not.
It's cognitively lazy to assume you can create some sort of schema for determining the truth with as few criteria as, "Is this censored?" or "Was this said on CNN?". It's just as brainwashed to reject everything you hear on the MSM as it is to accept it.
You care far more about what Reddit is saying about things than I ever have.