Robert F Kennedy on Bill Gates β¦.. YEP !!ππ€¨
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Who better to run health policy than a guy infamous for products full of viruses? And then being involved with the zika virus and GMO mosquitos. And talking how how authorities who 'do a really great job' with vaccines, can reduce the worlds population down.. by killing off millions and billions of people.
I've seen it said by others that their dog is just as qualified as Bill Gates with regard medical and health issues.. and their dog licks its own ass.
https://patriots.win/p/11SJxpCapM/bill-gates-said-vaccine-help-to-/c/
To be fair a lot of people would lick their own asses if they could. Every antifa degenerate that 4chan does a deep dive into ends up being some freak into scat porn and that sort of thing.
Bill Gates didn't say vaccines were going to reduce the global population by 15-20%, he said that through vaccinations and improved "healthcare" the birthrate or global population growth would decrease by 15-20% (the claim being that healthier people decide to have fewer kids, make of that what you will) of what it would have been without those "advancements".
Whether that's snake talk to mean forced sterilizations through vaccines or whatever other evil plan he was actually alluding to remains to be seen, but he didn't say vaccines were going to kill off 15-20% of the global population.
He said that they would decrease the worlds population by 10-15%. He didnβt say they would kill them but did say they would decrease the population which obviously doesnβt jive with something that is making you healthier.
His intentions are obviously evil to anyone paying attention, but saying vaccines would "decrease the world's population by 10-15%" implies getting rid of people who are already alive. Which isn't what he said or was talking about. He was talking about decreasing the growth rate so fewer people would be born over a certain period than otherwise would (e.g. 425M people born instead of 500M). The difference being that one is murder, the other isn't. Both are evil though assuming the method for decreasing the population growth isn't actually a healthier population choosing to have fewer kids as he claims but instead forced sterilization or something similar from vaccines. On the other hand, if his claim (again, being that healthier people choose to have fewer kids, not that vaccines themselves are going to decrease the birthrate) is correct and genuine, which I highly doubt, then there's actually nothing particularly evil or wrong behind what he's saying.
Perfectly said and why this claim in conjunction with his tossing bribes around at pharma and medical companies is such a red flag. If 'health' means a species dying off with fewer individuals alive, loss of genetic variation etc then the definition of health being used is itself flawed.