Interesting. I don't remember videocameras being that clear back then, but never spent a lot to get anything high end, so could be legitimate.
I'm not sure what this would prove or not prove. I've never doubted that planes hit the towers. Lived close enough to the city at the time to have talked to many people who were there when it happened, seeing the planes for themselves, and described it the same as I saw it when watching live on the news.
I don't believe, however, that planes hitting the top of the tower brought them straight down like a planned demolition. If it was so easy to drop buildings perfectly vertically, without taking out neighboring buildings, why does it require so much education, planning and manpower to demo buildings normally? At the very least, the feds would have known about the attack before it happened, but I think it's safe to assume it was more nefarious than that.
Interesting. I don't remember videocameras being that clear back then, but never spent a lot to get anything high end, so could be legitimate.
I'm not sure what this would prove or not prove. I've never doubted that planes hit the towers. Lived close enough to the city at the time to have talked to many people who were there when it happened, seeing the planes for themselves, and described it the same as I saw it when watching live on the news.
I don't believe, however, that planes hitting the top of the tower brought them straight down like a planned demolition. If it was so easy to drop buildings perfectly vertically, without taking out neighboring buildings, why does it require so much education, planning and manpower to demo buildings normally? At the very least, the feds would have known about the attack before it happened, but I think it's safe to assume it was more nefarious than that.
My first thought was 'that looks pretty high def for the day.'