Need a 2nd set of eyes…it looks like the ICAN Pfizer documents support the BMJ whistleblower’s claims that alerted people to Ventavia having issues with data integrity for their Phase III trials. Page 45/46 looks like a severe illness was reported but no notes were taken? 3.5k pgs of Ventavia docs
(www.icandecide.org)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Could they be faking deaths to pump Covid death numbers? Could they be using real deaths kinda in the same way they manipulate voting?
In the case of that first death, the commentary on the audit log looks like they were trying to cover up the death timeline for that trial participant rather than make one up.
They put in a follow up visit date for after the official death date, and it took multiple nudges for them to change their reporting to be correct. Someone also mentions that the myocardial infarction may need to be “reconsidered” since her family says she had one in 2017 but it didn’t come up in the health history screening…which seems unlikely. Unless they just did a poor screening job. They also attribute that infarction to a failed stent; but I’m wondering why she needed that stent so quickly after her vaccination?
They also argue about her pneumonia—the cause of death—being COVID pneumonia or not. Somehow, despite everyone and their brother needing a COVID test to go near a hospital in 2020, she supposedly was not tested upon admittance to the ER. The audit trail suggests that they couldn’t locate a nasal swab for her post-admittance. This poor woman.
Another woman wound up at the ER with hypokalemia, shortness of breath, and other concerning symptoms. It appears they kept trying to pass her symptoms off as COVID despite her testing samples being negative.