Some math peeps did some maths and they said that if scaled down to the size of a billiard ball that the earth would be smooth enough to qualify as tournament approved. So the earth is considered smooth, by these people anyway, everyone wants to argue but I think that we can agree that the Media and Governing Body are known to lie in order to exploit money from the masses. This is largely how the slave arm operates mostly undetected. Any way, if the earth is smooth then it is correct in calling it flat as well as smooth and flat are synonym buns!
I will add that one of the very first experiments that was said to prove or at the very least suggest that the earth is round with a distant sun can be demonstrated on a flat surface with a close, local, light source (This is important because a distant, large, sun would mean most of the rays hitting the earth are parallel ||| while a local source would produce light in many directions / | \ ). Local sun is an interesting topic for sure. I am referring to the Pillar and the well. http://www.projectglobalawakening.com/eratosthenes-circumference-of-the-earth/
So, I am not saying that the earth is flat. I am saying that the language was confused and that the experiments used to demonstrate the globe model do not specifically conform to the globe model rendering them useless for the sake of classifying differences between globe model and flat model.
I have questions because of this. How would anyone know back then? How did it become such a fiasco? Why do we blindly accept experiments that can be recreated under circumstances that prove they are not viable experiments?
I love flat earth!
Some math peeps did some maths and they said that if scaled down to the size of a billiard ball that the earth would be smooth enough to qualify as tournament approved. So the earth is considered smooth, by these people anyway, everyone wants to argue but I think that we can agree that the Media and Governing Body are known to lie in order to exploit money from the masses. This is largely how the slave arm operates mostly undetected. Any way, if the earth is smooth then it is correct in calling it flat as well as smooth and flat are synonym buns!
Smooth earth:
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/ten-things-you-dont-know-about-the-earth
https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/10763/is-earth-as-smooth-as-a-billiard-ball
Synonym:
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/smooth
I will add that one of the very first experiments that was said to prove or at the very least suggest that the earth is round with a distant sun can be demonstrated on a flat surface with a close, local, light source (This is important because a distant, large, sun would mean most of the rays hitting the earth are parallel ||| while a local source would produce light in many directions / | \ ). Local sun is an interesting topic for sure. I am referring to the Pillar and the well. http://www.projectglobalawakening.com/eratosthenes-circumference-of-the-earth/
So, I am not saying that the earth is flat. I am saying that the language was confused and that the experiments used to demonstrate the globe model do not specifically conform to the globe model rendering them useless for the sake of classifying differences between globe model and flat model.
I have questions because of this. How would anyone know back then? How did it become such a fiasco? Why do we blindly accept experiments that can be recreated under circumstances that prove they are not viable experiments?
Hu was an interesting fellow back in the day. Hu's story is interesting to say the least. https://historyofyesterday.com/historys-first-astronaut-c27f32b3e8b5?gi=5ea055107c46 Hu Wan. I am sure it means nothing that Wuhan was just made famous.