OMG, quick announcement, due to an uptick in general abuse, please note! The mod team will not tolerate shill faggots going after our based gay frogs! We love autists, whatever frender or orientation they might be! It's not their fault their mums drank the tap water! 🌈)))>>--❤️
(media.greatawakening.win)
❤️ WWG1WGAWW 🌈
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (221)
sorted by:
Nah mate, ya dodged...
Define "abusive"
Words do matter. This word has an inherently subjective nature. So define it. What constitutes "abuse" relative to the issue of deviance "tolerance" and/or promotion?
I'd like to hear what you believe to be the appropriate standards. For example, my views would go something like this:
(Abusive) - "die homos!"
(Not abusive) - "God condemns homosexual and other sexually deviant acts."
(Not abusive) - "Condoning and promoting sexual deviance is evil."
(Not abusive) - "God loves all and forgives all sins of those who repent."
(Not abusive) - "This community welcomes all sinners but promotion of evil will not be tolerated."
See the difference?