Russia Sub Threat Push Analysis
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Article is a couple of years old. What stood out to me is the fact that waters are no longer a 'safe haven'. If this is a Nuclear comm, could be signaling explosive information is no longer safe from exposure? Loss of control?
With some of that info from the Daily Mail, makes it somewhat sketchy to me. But of course it IS possible. Another possible scenario is that it just sank and is so "quiet" because it's a dead sub, with all onboard lost. The Russians have lost subs before. If y'all want to read a fascinating book about subs during the Cold War, check out a book called "Blind Man's Bluff".... it's a real life account of sub spying by US subs that were able to actually enter into USSR naval yards and spy on them.
There are several articles on it. Here's another one if you don't like the daily mail:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10904844/red-october-style-hunt-for-russian-subs-lasted-for-weeks-off-east-coast-as-navy-warns-waters-no-longer-safe-haven/
Sorry OP, The Sun is even less reliable than the Daily Mail.
I've actually found them pretty reliable. Do you have specific examples of when you found them unreliable? (They are also a good source of comms. I would be careful as well in how you judge certain stories. Some are comms. Keep that in mind.)
What are your preferred news sources?
If you want wiki, then here. I'd would use the timeline and then research the news stories from your preferred sites. The Fake News is going to leave out a lot, but if you feel that CNN or yahoo new is more reliable than that is up to you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasen-class_submarine
It's right there. The sun and the daily mail reported on it and 60 minutes reported on it. Wiki even reports on the incident. I think one of the major problems is finding truly "reliable" sources. That's why Q warned people to dig. So if you are still not convinced, I would suggest you dig for yourself. It's all there.
I think we all would like "reliable" news sources, but they are just propaganda arms. If you're saying "I don't like this source well enough" I think that is one giant problem all conservatives face. There are many Q posts dedicated to just how unreliable the fake news is.
I do as best as I can, but sources will always have some limits. You can dig on your own if you aren't satisfied with other's work. In fact, I would encourage it.
I use OANN and Citizen Press mostly, and a tew smaller sources. Do NOT believe anything from any mainstream media
I think rather than trying to cut oneself's off from any source with an opposing agenda it's better to learn to sift through the lies and figure out the truth. Q also said that news unlocks maps and that the news could come from any source. Q linked to stories that had proofs.
I don't think just watching OANN and Citizen Press is going to have all the news that unlocks maps. Also comms are also important to watch for. Q warned to learn the comms.
I'll have to disagree with you. I've found The Sun has given some very reliable material in the hunt for information. I've always found most of their stories line up well with events. The fake news also reports the events, but the Sun often gives details that the fake news left out. I think they're a solid source. What experience turned you off to them? Do you have any specific examples of articles that you felt mislead by?
I hear you, I can't explain further, I'm on the move today. Best wishes anon.
No problem. Good luck, fren!