"They are talking about adverse events ... well, they all have ... vaccines have .... but this is not from the vaccines ... they cant prove ... its its its ... after being vaccinated ... but, not adverse, I mean, they are adverse ... well if you look at it that way, haha ... but not from vaccine, I mean after vaccine ... but these are not known adverse events ... but, next question?"
Yeah, but ... you would expect an autopsy of everyone who died during the surveillance period, and a periodic check of spike protein levels during the surveillance period as well. If safety was a goal, these are the easiest two things to implement.
The problem? The moment an autopsy proves that he death was due to the vaccine, the whole program will need to be halted. So, do the trial incompetently, because they have the mistaken belief that if the genocide is due to incompetence they wont hang.
So now they want scientific evidence that the Vax caused the adverse effects. Short of that, the statement that it does is misleading. I see. Trust the science.
If we want to play them at their own games, then once an Adverse Event is reported in a clinical trial, it is up to them to prove that it was not caused by the vaccine - either by comparison with a control group, or by actual analysis. Its up to them to prove the vaccine is safe, not the other way round.
This sounds like Crazy Piglosi would drunkenly try to explain!
"They are talking about adverse events ... well, they all have ... vaccines have .... but this is not from the vaccines ... they cant prove ... its its its ... after being vaccinated ... but, not adverse, I mean, they are adverse ... well if you look at it that way, haha ... but not from vaccine, I mean after vaccine ... but these are not known adverse events ... but, next question?"
(Rub hands together strangely)
I wish someone can create this clip from how I am imagining it in my head lol
Definition of cause is always murky thus large numbers in the test group.
Yeah, but ... you would expect an autopsy of everyone who died during the surveillance period, and a periodic check of spike protein levels during the surveillance period as well. If safety was a goal, these are the easiest two things to implement.
The problem? The moment an autopsy proves that he death was due to the vaccine, the whole program will need to be halted. So, do the trial incompetently, because they have the mistaken belief that if the genocide is due to incompetence they wont hang.
So now they want scientific evidence that the Vax caused the adverse effects. Short of that, the statement that it does is misleading. I see. Trust the science.
If we want to play them at their own games, then once an Adverse Event is reported in a clinical trial, it is up to them to prove that it was not caused by the vaccine - either by comparison with a control group, or by actual analysis. Its up to them to prove the vaccine is safe, not the other way round.