Xi is different from CCP. Feel free to look through our 10+ Xi decodes. We already explained it on our telegram channel https://t.me/FTFoYGL and not going to rehash everything.
Actually you know what, I don't mind rehashing. It'll take a bit tho LOL
Your telegram channel has some interesting decodes but I am not sure that your read of Xi's role is entirely correct.
He's certainly different from CCP, but he is far from a benevolent ruler in the vein of Lee Kuan-yew (formerly of Singapore... although his sons are running it into the ground right now), or even his neighbor Putin (who, while not everyone would call him benevolent, at least has the best interests of Russia and its people in mind).
Putin is friendly to Christians. Xi is not. Putin does not commit widespread atrocities against his ruled people. Xi, even if he does not perpetrate it himself, tacitly allows it. Putin does not impose draconian censorship upon his own people; Xi does.
The people of Taiwan are distinct from the people of the mainland. They share some things in common culturally, but there is also much that has diverged. I am not sure that it would be a good idea for them to recombine at present... especially considering the example of Hong Kong. Yes, you could say that reneging on Hong Kong's independence was a blow to the deep state, but does that justify the terrible things that the city and its people have been subjected to as a result? Hong Kong is being run into the ground right now, because the CCP wants to build up Hainan to replace it as a nexus of commerce. (It is unlikely they will succeed, IMHO.) In contrast, Putin has treated the people of Crimea and eastern Ukraine very well, and in some sense of the word given them their independence.
What is your explanation of these differences?
As a result, I would certainly hope that Xi is taken out right after the CCP is. In my heart of hearts I believe that the greatest thing to happen to China would be its full embrace of Christianity, which has been suppressed there for far too long by various regimes. I do not think that would be possible under Xi.
In America, unless you are a world history buff or have a degree, our historical frame of reference is about 300 years. Sure, we have a modest understanding of classical civilization or European history. But even 200 level college courses barely touch on the totality of world history. Everything we learn is based on the discovery, settlement and Independence of America.
What do you know about the Golden Horde other than they were Mongols? How they governed Russia, Ukraine and Central Asia. What do you know about the wars between the Mongols and Chinese? Can you even name the last Chinese Dynasty and when it was overthrown? The history of Taiwan? The history of Central Asia? These are things that we simply arent taught, even in college courses, unless you are specializing in a specific time period and area.
But educated Russian and Chinese citizens understanding is counted in the hundreds and even thousands of years. Their culture is directly related to their history. They act and react based on this history.
Sorry to disappoint you, but I probably know more about Chinese history than I do about North American. Are you informed on the topic enough to actually discuss it?
Do you know about the immensely terrible mismanagement of the nation under the Qing dynasty? How about how they dealt with the Taiping rebellion? Or their constant paranoia about potential Han Chinese uprisings and their prevailing censorship as a result? Or perhaps their cruel and unusual literary inquisitions? You can draw many parallels between the Qing dynasty and the CCP, even though the latter hates to be compared to any imperial dynasty.
Without elaborating too much on the topic, I do think the Song dynasty was overall the kindest to its own citizenry. (Nowhere is this more accentuated than by the reign of Emperor Renzong.) Both the Song and Ming dynasties were a far cry better than the Yuan and Qing (although even the Yuan was much better than the Qing, if only for the reason that Mongols tended to assimilate more easily with their ruled peoples). The ROC regime, despite a host of issues caused by the fact that China was still in a period of typical inter-dynastic chaos, would have grown into a far more benevolent regime because the mindset of its leaders were far more standard in terms of their alignment with traditional Chinese culture. (Chinese politics and philosophy is in itself a complex topic, but...)
Xi is different from CCP. Feel free to look through our 10+ Xi decodes. We already explained it on our telegram channel https://t.me/FTFoYGL and not going to rehash everything.
Actually you know what, I don't mind rehashing. It'll take a bit tho LOL
Your telegram channel has some interesting decodes but I am not sure that your read of Xi's role is entirely correct.
He's certainly different from CCP, but he is far from a benevolent ruler in the vein of Lee Kuan-yew (formerly of Singapore... although his sons are running it into the ground right now), or even his neighbor Putin (who, while not everyone would call him benevolent, at least has the best interests of Russia and its people in mind).
Putin is friendly to Christians. Xi is not. Putin does not commit widespread atrocities against his ruled people. Xi, even if he does not perpetrate it himself, tacitly allows it. Putin does not impose draconian censorship upon his own people; Xi does.
The people of Taiwan are distinct from the people of the mainland. They share some things in common culturally, but there is also much that has diverged. I am not sure that it would be a good idea for them to recombine at present... especially considering the example of Hong Kong. Yes, you could say that reneging on Hong Kong's independence was a blow to the deep state, but does that justify the terrible things that the city and its people have been subjected to as a result? Hong Kong is being run into the ground right now, because the CCP wants to build up Hainan to replace it as a nexus of commerce. (It is unlikely they will succeed, IMHO.) In contrast, Putin has treated the people of Crimea and eastern Ukraine very well, and in some sense of the word given them their independence.
What is your explanation of these differences?
As a result, I would certainly hope that Xi is taken out right after the CCP is. In my heart of hearts I believe that the greatest thing to happen to China would be its full embrace of Christianity, which has been suppressed there for far too long by various regimes. I do not think that would be possible under Xi.
Culture and history.
In America, unless you are a world history buff or have a degree, our historical frame of reference is about 300 years. Sure, we have a modest understanding of classical civilization or European history. But even 200 level college courses barely touch on the totality of world history. Everything we learn is based on the discovery, settlement and Independence of America.
What do you know about the Golden Horde other than they were Mongols? How they governed Russia, Ukraine and Central Asia. What do you know about the wars between the Mongols and Chinese? Can you even name the last Chinese Dynasty and when it was overthrown? The history of Taiwan? The history of Central Asia? These are things that we simply arent taught, even in college courses, unless you are specializing in a specific time period and area.
But educated Russian and Chinese citizens understanding is counted in the hundreds and even thousands of years. Their culture is directly related to their history. They act and react based on this history.
Sorry to disappoint you, but I probably know more about Chinese history than I do about North American. Are you informed on the topic enough to actually discuss it?
Do you know about the immensely terrible mismanagement of the nation under the Qing dynasty? How about how they dealt with the Taiping rebellion? Or their constant paranoia about potential Han Chinese uprisings and their prevailing censorship as a result? Or perhaps their cruel and unusual literary inquisitions? You can draw many parallels between the Qing dynasty and the CCP, even though the latter hates to be compared to any imperial dynasty.
Without elaborating too much on the topic, I do think the Song dynasty was overall the kindest to its own citizenry. (Nowhere is this more accentuated than by the reign of Emperor Renzong.) Both the Song and Ming dynasties were a far cry better than the Yuan and Qing (although even the Yuan was much better than the Qing, if only for the reason that Mongols tended to assimilate more easily with their ruled peoples). The ROC regime, despite a host of issues caused by the fact that China was still in a period of typical inter-dynastic chaos, would have grown into a far more benevolent regime because the mindset of its leaders were far more standard in terms of their alignment with traditional Chinese culture. (Chinese politics and philosophy is in itself a complex topic, but...)