A little Gem that was on Truth Social. Nothing we really didn't already know I suppose.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 Memory Hole 🕳️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (248)
sorted by:
Alright, I appreciate the source, although it's seeming... obvious... why it doesn't come up in a search of traditional databases.
For this to be some sort of damning evidence, it needs to be considered a credible source. You seem to see it as one. So I need some help understanding something.
I've read the story. I see that it seems to share wording with popularly-run AP stuff, and to be clear, your sourced story cites the AP as the author of the text, even though it differs from the actual text run in the AP.
Are you suggesting, then, that the AP did originally run the story that said, "Kenyan-born", but then realized its mistake, erased it, and the only people who didn't change the story was this East African Standard? So that's why it's credible?
Can you explain to me why I should take a source that misspells Barack Obama's name as the most credible source of his heritage?
If I presented a single source to you confirming that Don Watkins is Q, and then told you that meant Ron Watkins was definitely Q, would you be willing to give that evidence the benefit of the doubt?
So the answer is no, you can’t explain why I should take a random website that misspells Obama’s name as an authoritative source on his heritage that outweighs those sources that properly spell his name.
If this is an incorrect assumption, I’ll hear the justification for why this source should be considered as authoritative anyway.
If we’re talking about moving goalposts, I am expecting the argument that this website is revealing the True Name of Obama, and that “Barack Obama” is a cover name or something developed by the Deep State, and there are no such things as misspellings in Q World. I’ll be interested in a more dynamic theory, but I guess I’ll see how you respond.
Baracks own brother says he was born in Kenya. Why doesn't that source count?
It does. It’s also contextualized by Malik Obama’s only having met his half-brother after Barack Obama was in his mid-twenties and was a US Senator.
And Malik’s support of Trump, and therefore of Trump’s assertions.
And other members of Obama’s family, including Malik’s sister has contested him.
Also, the “birth certificate” posted by Malik said that Obama was born in the Republic of Kenya in 1961. Kenya was not a Republic until 1964.
And quite clearly has a seal on the bottom that says “Australia.” Malik just posted a forgery. You can verify the facts yourself.
https://archive.ph/Ejj75
So it’s not like Malik is claiming to have grown up with the man. Him being a family member was enough credibility to make his claim worth looking into more closely, but it doesn’t add enough weight for me to take his claim on faith and assume that maybe everyone is wrong about when the Republic of Kenya officially existed on legal documentation.
Unfortunately for you, if you’re right, you’re still demonstrating no competency in addressing it.
Disassembling a foundation of lies means proving verifiably each and every lie. Not simply dismissing the entire system.
Even if the mass media is putting out nothing but the exact opposite of the truth, proving that is going FAR beyond saying, “the media distorts stuff sometimes.”
There is a chasm of difference between understanding that a source is biased and misleading, and believing it produces nothing but lies.
Researchers understand this.
Researchers do not dismiss evidence based entirely on the source or what conclusion that evidence supports.
I’ve examined evidence presented, by you, in the form of random blogs and anonymous Twitter accounts.
You won’t even consider anything remotely possible if it even APPEARS to agree with a mainstream narrative.
Again, I’m not particularly intimidated by the confidence you have in the way you operate, and much of it is on the basis of these behaviors.