Exactly 1 month ago, a paper was published showing that a 2015 moderna patented sequence exists in the middle of sarscov2. 3 days later, another article was published saying it came from the wet market, authored by 4 people who in Jan 2020 told Fauci "results were inconsistent with natural origin" - The Great Awakening

Exactly 1 month ago, a paper was published showing that a 2015 moderna patented sequence exists in the middle of sarscov2. 3 days later, another article was published saying it came from the wet market, authored by 4 people who in Jan 2020 told Fauci "results were inconsistent with natural origin" (www.frontiersin.org)

posted 2 years ago by hope111111 2 years ago by hope111111 +45 / -0

4 comments

4 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (4)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– hope111111 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

NYT circled the wagons three days after this article was published, countering with two articles that claimed a natural origin. The problem with this is that 4 of the authors of these two studies are in the Fauci emails from JAN 2020 saying that the genome is "inconsistent with evolutionary theory."

Clowns at work.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– bubble_bursts 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Do you have the names of the 4 authors handy?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– hope111111 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYJX8_vWei4

It is all discussed in this great vid.

Names are Marion Koopmans, Angela Rasmussen, Stephen Goldstein, Kristian Anderson

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q