If you can’t judge the difference on this obvious case, maybe Judging isn’t your fortes !!!🤯🤯😏
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (5)
sorted by:
She has no right to sit on the bench, deciding the course of women's lives if she refuses to define what a woman is.
Defining the course of anyone's lives but their own should be strictly off the table.
Can we PLEASE go back to limited government intervention in person's lives and return their focus on the corporations where it fucking belongs....
If she can’t define “woman,” will she be able to define any other noun?
she will need a botanist to define what a tree is for her.
She cannot be compelled to incriminate herself. Saying she is not a biologist is the only viable way. To call upon the fifth ....
But then she is impotent to hold a scotus position and any judgeship at all.
As the famous Pim Fortuyn once said: go cook some food, bitch.