Remember, Byrne painted Meadows as a totally incompetent person holding Trump back from exposing the election fraud.
Now, lets think a bit deeply. Do you think Trump did not know about the election fraud? There is 0 chance of that.
So when Mark Meadows and others were holding him back, didnt he feel suspicious about him? Clearly he know what was going on.
So why did he keep Mark around? He needed a cover for not pushing forth with exposing the election fraud all the way (because of devolution).
It even makes sense he invited Byrne over for a whole day, and put the incompetence of his entire circle on display, so Byrne will spread the word "Trump is being adviced by incompetent people".
Given all this, would Gini be making all these kinds of communications with Meadows? Either she is not in the circle - highly unlikely, considering Clarence is probably the only true Justice Trump could have counted on for devolution, OR she was setting Meadows up for exactly this moment.
Remember, Jan 6th is about figuring out the details of devolution, and Clarence must have been the key figure in the devolution on the SCOTUS.
Based on all this, we can definitely make one accurate prediction. We are gonna have a massive shortage in the shops for popcorn.
I always thought that Byrnes account of that meeting was fishy.....and NOT because Byrnes lied about what he saw but because it made no sense per your thoughts.
Meadows response sounds like he might be privy to a big chunk of the plan
Remember, Byrne painted Meadows as a totally incompetent person holding Trump back from exposing the election fraud.
Now, lets think a bit deeply. Do you think Trump did not know about the election fraud? There is 0 chance of that.
So when Mark Meadows and others were holding him back, didnt he feel suspicious about him? Clearly he know what was going on.
So why did he keep Mark around? He needed a cover for not pushing forth with exposing the election fraud all the way (because of devolution).
It even makes sense he invited Byrne over for a whole day, and put the incompetence of his entire circle on display, so Byrne will spread the word "Trump is being adviced by incompetent people".
Given all this, would Gini be making all these kinds of communications with Meadows? Either she is not in the circle - highly unlikely, considering Clarence is probably the only true Justice Trump could have counted on for devolution, OR she was setting Meadows up for exactly this moment.
Remember, Jan 6th is about figuring out the details of devolution, and Clarence must have been the key figure in the devolution on the SCOTUS.
Based on all this, we can definitely make one accurate prediction. We are gonna have a massive shortage in the shops for popcorn.
I always thought that Byrnes account of that meeting was fishy.....and NOT because Byrnes lied about what he saw but because it made no sense per your thoughts.
Exactly my thoughts.
I believe the other dude that Byrnes got pissed at was Pat Cipollone who supposedly disrespected Trump in that meeting....