About the only part of that statement I'll agree with is that the Rothschilds are evil.
I've seen no real evidence they're Khazars. They could just as easily be normal, Ashkenazi Jews corrupted into Satanic worship.
If the Star of David was the Star of Remphan, why did first century Christians incorporate it into a common symbol showing the Jewish roots of Christianity?
So, that link suggests that the Khazars are actually Hebrew in origin. Descendants of the tribe of Simeon. That's interesting, but is pretty far from proving anything you've said. In fact, it's a bit of a non-sequitur. What does that have to do with anything?
So, proof isn't proof unless it's from an area outside of where first-century Christianity existed, because any evidence that disproves what you say is just a psy-op, and here! Look! The Khazars had Hebrew blood and a tradition that says they're descended from the tribe of Simeon and so that proves somehow that they're evil? And this symbol that's used all over the place by many different people groups that just so happens to also be used by the Jewish people proves that the Jewish people are evil because there's a star mentioned in the Bible as a symbol and even though there's no description of the symbol at all it must be the same one because they're totally both stars! Wowee! And, look, the Pope has a similar star on his hat that we still haven't established is really a universally bad symbol except that it was just by Jews, so it must be! Zounds!
How do you tolerate living among us proles with such a towering intellect?
About the only part of that statement I'll agree with is that the Rothschilds are evil.
I've seen no real evidence they're Khazars. They could just as easily be normal, Ashkenazi Jews corrupted into Satanic worship.
If the Star of David was the Star of Remphan, why did first century Christians incorporate it into a common symbol showing the Jewish roots of Christianity?
So, that link suggests that the Khazars are actually Hebrew in origin. Descendants of the tribe of Simeon. That's interesting, but is pretty far from proving anything you've said. In fact, it's a bit of a non-sequitur. What does that have to do with anything?
Again, if it was known in the first century to be associated with idolatry, why would first century Christians have drawn this in their churches: http://www.izzaboutchu.yolasite.com/resources/mennorah%20star%20fish.jpg
So, proof isn't proof unless it's from an area outside of where first-century Christianity existed, because any evidence that disproves what you say is just a psy-op, and here! Look! The Khazars had Hebrew blood and a tradition that says they're descended from the tribe of Simeon and so that proves somehow that they're evil? And this symbol that's used all over the place by many different people groups that just so happens to also be used by the Jewish people proves that the Jewish people are evil because there's a star mentioned in the Bible as a symbol and even though there's no description of the symbol at all it must be the same one because they're totally both stars! Wowee! And, look, the Pope has a similar star on his hat that we still haven't established is really a universally bad symbol except that it was just by Jews, so it must be! Zounds!
How do you tolerate living among us proles with such a towering intellect?