Theory on "We are the news now"

posted 2 years ago by TheWestDeclines 2 years ago by TheWestDeclines +41 / -0

I've been seeing a lot more Legacy Media seemingly "leaking out" real truth nuggets the last several weeks. Anons are posting stories here and of course on 8kun, where all the real research is happening. 4chan is nearly completely lost these days, overrun with shills and of course owned by glowies, for a few years now. But these "real news" stories got me to thinking about Q's line We are the news now. He/she/they only used it twice, far as I can see:

First in post 2832 here: https://qanon.pub/?q=we%20are%20the%20news#2832 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: bca184 No.5283745 📁 Feb 20 2019 11:09:19 (EST) WE ARE THE NEWS NOW. Q

Second in post 2845 here: https://qanon.pub/?q=we%20are%20the%20news We are the news now (WW). Q

All I've ever seen the interpretation of this is that Anons are the "we." Meaning: Anons are now the news. But what if the "We" is meant to be understood as Q, and Q is the news now? Meaning: Q is now the news and will be slowly revealing the truth in the Legacy Media, which normies turn to and count on for their information. I'm thinking this way: When you visit Reddit /politics, all it is is a whirlwind of Trump-hating, Republican-bashing 24/7, literally. But what if some white hats have/get access to key news personnel at key junctures to further the cause of the Great Awakening? Take for example the current SCOTUS hearings, bringing to light Judge Jackson's record of light sentences for child pornography.

Google search on "scotus hearings child pornography" to see what I mean.

9 comments

9 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (9)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– impera 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I think its a 'nature abhors a vacuum' type thing.

Traditional media certainly arent news any longer. So who steps up? Independant journalists, anons noticing things in their local area or sphere and bringing things to wider attention. The crowdsource model applied to news gathering and investigative research.

'Handle with care' is the corollary that comes with this new burden by the way, and is just as important.. because otherwise you spin off to wild conjecture and all that energy is spent on nothing. Or even worse, detracts from the big picture.

permalink save report block reply