Where Hunter Biden's laptop? The FBI has no clue!
(twitter.com)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
The funny thing is the data on his laptop is like the furry little gizmo from "Gremlins" after getting wet... it is replicating like mad and popping up everywhere..
My last question would be the quote from office space: “So what DO you do here?” Lol
So apparently there were a few articles floating around that claimed the FBI accidentally destroyed Hunter Biden's laptop. Some of them were explicitly labeled as satirical and all of them had some satirical elements in them. Links of the so-called fact checks are at the bottom and you can make up your own mind.
I tend to think that these might be satirical, as the FBI would definitely destroy the laptop or secretly keep it as black mail if ordered to do so by the cabal, but they would never announce that it ever existed (and therefore that they ever had it or destroyed it).
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/12/fact-check-the-fbi-did-not-admit-to-accidentally-destroying-the-laptop-that-supposedly-belonged-to-hunter-biden.html
https://misbar.com/en/factcheck/2021/03/27/fbi-didnt-destroy-hunter-biden%E2%80%99s-laptop
Isn't it in Switzerland right now being forensically examined? Or is that another laptop? There are like 3 floating around I think.
That FBI boy should not receive another paycheck without answering the questions TRUTHFULLY. I'm guessing he is a democRAT.
How about Seth Rich's laptop?
"what would you say... ya do here???"
Sooprise sooprise…
If Matt Gaetz was being serious about this, the first question he would have asked after the guy said that it wasn't under his purview, is, "Well, whose purview is it then? If it's not under your purview, then who exactly should I be dragging in here to answer this question?"
Gaetz did ask that later in the interview.
uoh uho lemme get this one...What does Russia have???
Missed opportunities.
5a. Provide document's that show missing laptops have occurred in the past, what measures were taken to recover those missing laptops, and the resolutions of those cases.
And if he gave Gaetz a bullshit answer as to whose purview it was, saying that he didn't know, then Gaetz should have proceeded to ask, "Well, then whose job is it to know whose purview that is? Who do I drag in here to ask about who, specifically, has been assigned to this case?"
And if this guy can't even point him in the right direction to talk to a superior at the bureau who would know who is actually in charge of that case, then I'd really start lighting fire under his toes if I were in that position.
But no, Gaetz wasn't interested in actually finding an answer. He was interested in making a spectacle.
Ehhhhh, I think grilling him on the exact location of a piece of evidence is pushing it a little bit far here.
This exchange is all just for show. He's asking the question to the wrong guy. Not every single person in the FBI is going to have specific knowledge about this specific case.