I disagree, I think that there is some merit to the Judge's reasoning that actually benefit Trump in the long run if his case is as solid as it is.
The protection here lies within the Durham case alleging facts that are already proven right by his investigation and we already know Trump would, without a doubt, know more about what facts Durham has at the ready and has already presented (known or unknown to the public).
This unseen evidence that has yet to come to trial to be shown, wouldn't be something a judge would be able to meander away if the case is already in motion. He will have his chance to present it. Having asked for a different judge would assume that Trump is seeking additional favor, that his case would be contingent on that.
We also have to say that a judge of 25 years would have a history and would be grilled by anything that seems contrary to anything he's ruled on in the past that goes against the same grain of Trump. But, if he does agree to Trump's point, the public will have a harder time resisting the judge's motives because he already made clear that he has no allegiance to the Clinton's and the deal of time between the appointment I would say is to our benefit to guard against the "he just was a Pro-Trumper" type argument.
THIS IS GOOD - Trump wouldn't make the case if he knew he couldn't win it. It's in the 11th hour right now - no mistakes.
I disagree, I think that there is some merit to the Judge's reasoning that actually benefit Trump in the long run if his case is as solid as it is.
The protection here lies within the Durham case alleging facts that are already proven right by his investigation and we already know Trump would, without a doubt, know more about what facts Durham has at the ready and has already presented (known or unknown to the public).
This unseen evidence that has yet to come to trial to be shown, wouldn't be something a judge would be able to meander away if the case is already in motion. He will have his chance to present it. Having asked for a different judge would assume that Trump is seeking additional favor, that his case would be contingent on that.
We also have to say that a judge of 25 years would have a history and would be grilled by anything that seems contrary to anything he's ruled on in the past that goes against the same grain of Trump. But, if he does agree to Trump's point, the public will have a harder time resisting the judge's motives because he already made clear that he has no allegiance to the Clinton's and the deal of time between the appointment I would say is to our benefit to guard against the "he just was a Pro-Trumper" type argument.
THIS IS GOOD - Trump wouldn't make the case if he knew he couldn't win it. It's in the 11th hour right now - no mistakes.