The way I see it is as follows...
Multiple people have pointed out that the sheer number of vaccines made with this new technology that were being sent out was absolutely staggering.
People have, quite understandably, questioned how it was even possible to make such an incredible number of them in such a short period of time.
Other people have also observed that about 5% of the batches contain over 90% of the adverse effects.
There's a logical reason for this. The logical reason is they obviously could not produce enough of their poison death shots to kill off as many of the American population as they wanted.
Trump flooded the system with fake ones with Operation Warpspeed. 95% of the vaccine batches were much more safe. Maybe they were a real vaccine, maybe they were saline, who knows? But they were definitely different, and much less deadly.
Trump totally scrambled their system by flooding it with fake vaccines for a fake pandemic. Once people got the safe fake shot, they would no longer be motivated to go take the real poison death shot. By the time most people had gotten 1-2 shots, and boosters came around, and restrictions came back, they woke up, and refused to get boosters en-masse.
Now that (most) people are convinced they're safe, either because they were never worried or because they trust their first two shots, or they had it already, mandates and pushing additional boosters is a largely losing argument.
The deep state was still able to do some damage, in the end. They produced some of their poison death shots and used everything they had, because they knew they were locked into their plan, but it wasn't enough to accomplish their goal, only enough to expose themselves.
What do you guys think?
It would kind of make sense. My idealism says "Why not just tell the truth? Tell people it's poison, show your sources, you have a duty to be upfront with people." But that obviously assumes such a thing is possible and effective. We saw over the years how hobbled the Trump admin was with traitors in its midst, and how the media was able to twist reality and convince a lot of people Trump was literally Hitler. So maybe the straight shooting approach wouldn't actually have saved more lives in the end?
He told the truth with Ivermectin and Hydroxy and it did not go well (in the short term)
No it would not have. The deep state I believe still had a lot of power and who know what they would have done. Another 9/11, few planes coming down, who knows.
That's why I get irritated when even Ron Paul falls into the trap sometimes of calling Trump soft on the COVID thing and this is in spite of Paul also talking about the Deep State. Everyone just leaves out how Trump did tell us about other treatments early on and how demonized they got.
That is very true. The lying fake news attacked him.
If Trump told the truth, the vaccine would get pulled, and we lock down for 10 years while they make a "safe" one, Trump would be gone, America would be destroyed, and the vaccine would kill everyone anyway. It was the only effective way to completely disarm the coronavirus psyop.