It is highlighting the '3' in the previous sentence. That is, the first statement says someone has come forward. Then he says, "that makes 3." The response is essentially, "Wait. What? '3'! You mean there are two more than the one you just told us about? Why has nothing happened yet!?"
Missing 1
Missing 2
Missing 3
FIND missing [3].
Future proves past.
NOTHING is a coincidence.
Q post 520. If you post a q post, please give the number of the post so others can go look or link to it. https://qagg.news/?q=%23%23520
It is highlighting the '3' in the previous sentence. That is, the first statement says someone has come forward. Then he says, "that makes 3." The response is essentially, "Wait. What? '3'! You mean there are two more than the one you just told us about? Why has nothing happened yet!?"
I was wondering that as well...